NYC mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa is screwing up, and doesn't mention Zohran Mamdani in a radio interview where he had a meltdown

I'd hoped Curtis Sliwa might at least prove a perceptive conservative candidate for NYC mayor. But now, it looks like he's blowing it, based on how in a radio interview, he bewilderingly refused to raise the issue of Muslim candidate Zohran Mamdani and his socialist platform:

During an interview with 77 WABC, Sliwa was accused by radio host Sid Rosenberg of spending too much time focusing on his opponent former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo rather than socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani.

“So far, you’ve been on this show for eight minutes, and all you’ve talked about is Cuomo,” Rosenberg said. “And, I know you hate him, and I’m going to be honest with you Curtis — because we’ve been friends for a long time. I don’t feel like you’re running against Mamdani anymore. I really don’t.”

Rosenberg went on to point out that Sliwa was “losing sight” of who he was actually running against because he was so focused on Cuomo, and added that Sliwa had to “leap frog Cuomo to beat the guy in first.”

“I go to your page, I got to go twelve goddann tweets before I see Mamdani’s name,” Rosenberg continued. “This obsession with Cuomo has to stop, he’s not winning. You can beat Cuomo, and still lose the election. Eight minutes in, you haven’t mentioned Mamdani once, why?”

Well if all Sliwa's worried about is Cuomo, then he can't possibly be a courageous man. Rather, he's a dhimmi, as his inexplicable failure to discuss Mamdani suggests. If the election is lost to somebody as awful as Mamdani happens to be, Sliwa could be faulted for this. Why indeed wouldn't he mention anything Mamdani did wrong? Aside from all that, if Sliwa had a meltdown, that doesn't help matters either. It's very sad Sliwa's now taking a stupefying route, and won't even at least show the courage to condemn Mamdani's wrongdoings, regardless of whether Sliwa can win the election or not.