There's more challenging reasons to oppose Hamas overlording Gaza

USA secretary of state Marco Rubio makes a primary point that Hamas cannot be in control of Gaza, but there's shortcomings, as could surely be expected:

Hamas must end its control over Gaza for America to even consider the idea of a Palestinian state, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday morning.

“In order for that aspiration to even be credible, it has to be realistic. We can’t have a Palestinian state that’s governed by Hamas or by some terrorist organization whose stated purpose for existence is the destruction of the Jewish state. That would never work,” Rubio said.

“Until Gaza is governed by people that are not interested in destroying Israel. Until there are no security threats emanating against Israel from Gaza, forget about statehood. You’re not going to have peace,” Rubio added.

Can we be clear about something? All this blabber about a "palestinian state" has got to end, and the Islamic world must be told it cannot continue, mainly because it's just long been a shoddy excuse for creating a segregated society. The Religion of Peace is what should be in discussion, and how it cannot continue as a "teaching tool", because it's only indoctrination to evil. It's sad how nobody encourages integration for society, and why certain ideologies must be abandoned for that to be possible, and prove beyond a reasonable doubt a certain side is serious. Would Mr. Rubio be willing to stress those points for a change?