Why is the Breitbart network getting stuff from fools like these?
Andrew Breitbart's news network has plenty to recommend. Unfortunately, there are, as is surely to be expected, a couple of contributors who've blown it big time. Take for example Alicia Colon at Big Journalism, who in writing about the problems with Planned Parenthood, really screwed up big time - that is, she chose the wrong "conservatives" for citations:
And I'm afraid Karl Rove has also disqualified himself as a worthy example of a right-wing politician, as this earlier info tells.
Then, there's Matthew Vadum, who's also flubbed big time with the following:
Colon and Vadum would do well to have a chat with Gaffney and learn why they'd do well to distance themselves from Norquist, who could very well be a CAIR plant, and come to think of it, why Rove is not worth their time either.
Update: some more alleged conservatives who flubbed big time on this same network include Patrick Tuohey, just by using Norquist as an example of someone who's supposedly for unity, Brian Johnson, who seems to have associated himself with Norquist, Michael Volpe, who also cited the charlatan superficially, Rep. Pete Sessions, a contributor called Capitol Confidential, and even Rich Muny, who's got more of these superficial flubs here, here, here, and most recently here. These are all current contributors to the Breitbart network who've really let me down for their failure to take note of Gaffney's important work.
Of course when the MSM reported last year on the James O’Keefe and Lila Rose sting operation on Planned Parenthood, they left the nastiness to blogs like Democratic Underground so the lefties could complain that O’Keefe and Rose were being mentored by the horrible Leadership Institute. To them there could be nothing worse than that extremist group which produced such horrors as Mitch McConnell, Grover Norquist, Joe Wilson and, shudder, Karl Rove.Uh oh. I'm afraid she really blew it there in using Grover Norquist as an example of someone whom the MSM supposedly would have a problem with. As I've noted here before, Norquist is an agent for the cause of Islam. Speaking of which, Frank Gaffney, who'd written about him before, has written another item about him again in relation to the CPAC embarrassment (Hat tip: Jihad Watch). And here's one more important item from The American Thinker.
And I'm afraid Karl Rove has also disqualified himself as a worthy example of a right-wing politician, as this earlier info tells.
Then, there's Matthew Vadum, who's also flubbed big time with the following:
The conservative movement and Republican Party are filled with intelligent, thoughtful commentators such as Larry Elder, Thomas Sowell, David Harsanyi, Phil Kerpen, Christopher Horner, Fred Smith, Grover Norquist, Star Parker, Hugh Hewitt, George Will, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.), former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, and (yes) Ted Nugent.Anyone got a thesaurus? Because I think I'm going to need to search for the opposite meaning of "smear by association". Then again, maybe the answer to that could be "whitewash by association"!
Colon and Vadum would do well to have a chat with Gaffney and learn why they'd do well to distance themselves from Norquist, who could very well be a CAIR plant, and come to think of it, why Rove is not worth their time either.
Update: some more alleged conservatives who flubbed big time on this same network include Patrick Tuohey, just by using Norquist as an example of someone who's supposedly for unity, Brian Johnson, who seems to have associated himself with Norquist, Michael Volpe, who also cited the charlatan superficially, Rep. Pete Sessions, a contributor called Capitol Confidential, and even Rich Muny, who's got more of these superficial flubs here, here, here, and most recently here. These are all current contributors to the Breitbart network who've really let me down for their failure to take note of Gaffney's important work.
Labels: islam, Moonbattery, msm foulness, RINOs
