Tel-Chai Nation

Krauthammer, one of the most pretentious writers for the Wash. Post, whom I consider a right-wing moonbat, has slipped propaganda into his latest column on Israel again, implying that there's nothing wrong with Israel making concessions to Fatah, again. For example, his newest balderdash begins with:

Until Palestine is ready to offer concessions, peace talks will accomplish nothing.

So he's invoking that lie that derived from a derogatory name the Romans conceived, that the British later shifted to the Arabs of Israel? And he doesn't even at least say "Fatah"?

Among the victims was the Israeli peace movement and its illusions about Palestinian acceptance of Israel. The Israeli Left, mugged by reality, is now moribund. And the Israeli Right is chastened. No serious player believes it can hang on forever to the West Bank.

This has created a unique phenomenon in Israel — a broad-based national consensus for giving nearly all the West Bank in return for peace. The moment is doubly unique because the only man who can deliver such a deal is Likud prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu — and he is prepared to do it.

Hence the wisdom of how the Obama administration has shaped the coming talks: No interim deals, no partial agreements. There are no mutual concessions that can be made separately within the great issues — territory, security, Jerusalem, the so-called right of return — to reach agreement. The concessions must be among these issues — thus if Israel gives up its dream of a united Jerusalem, for example, the Palestinians in return give up their dream of the right of return.

And I guess he's saying that I should give up my wish to live in Jerusalem, and sees nothing wrong with segregation, or even Islam? What a disgusting, blatant moron he is. And he also implies - or lies - that Israeli citizenry is willing to make concessions, even "last" ones, in order to achieve "peace" with Islamofascism?

Most important is the directive issued by U.S. peace negotiator George Mitchell: What’s under discussion is a final settlement of the conflict. Meaning, no further claims. Conflict over.

Who does Krauthammer represent anyway? The Obama administration? And does he really think this'd be a "final" settlement? That man is such an atrocity on 2 feet.

What’s standing in the way? Israeli settlements? Foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman, one of Israel’s most nationalist politicians, lives in a settlement and has said openly that to achieve peace he and his family would abandon their home. What about the religious settlers? Might they not resist? Some tried that during the Gaza withdrawal, clinging to synagogue rooftops. What happened? Jewish soldiers pulled them down and took them away. If Israel is offered real peace, the soldiers will do that again.

OOOOOOHHHH, I see! So he's saying it's quite fine if the Israeli government does that yet again, and even parrots something that may have been taken out of context about Lieberman? Again, Krauthammer, is a most atrocious, shameless man. And you know what? I don't think he's a conservative at all. I will say however, that "conservatives" who advocate exactly what the left wants fill me with absolute horror. Why exactly do concessions by Israel matter? Such propaganda only trivializes the problems with Islamofascism. We could even add some of the shari'a and Islamic hatemongering that's already been established under Fatah/Hamas, which Krauthammer shows little to no interest in here.

Krauthammer is a shameless tool for the left who deserves to be a pariah. Yet this man gets his foul smelling trash published in allegedly dignified publications like NRO. He is nothing but a fraud, and owes an apology for pushing dangerous propaganda that can be harmful not only to Israel, but even to America.

Labels: dhimmitude, islam, Israel, jihad, Moonbattery, msm foulness, terrorism