What if the psychiatric "experts" hired in the Halimi case aren't "independent"?
1 Comments Published by Avi Green on Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 10:57 AM.
JNS ran an article about the abominable continuation of the French courts' avoiding the issue of anti-semitism in the murder of Sarah Halimi by a Muslim. And among the things discussed, I noticed they said:
One of the most offensive things about European political conduct is the tendency to waste taxpayers' money, and there can be no doubt the problem is around cases like these somewhere, where it ends up in the wrong hands, for all the wrong reasons.
Two of the three independent psychiatric experts commissioned by the investigation said that marijuana nullified the man’s judgment and therefore his criminal responsibility. The third judge expressed a partial abolition of culpability.I have to wonder: is it possible these weren't really "independent experts" at all, but rather, at least 2 people specially hired to give a false verdict to suit the judicial system's positions? I'm sure if one "follows the money", they'll find somethng very fishy indeed about how politics are operated in France, and even Britain. This is also a system that's let rapists off the hook because the culprits were Muslim, so it's not only Jews who're the victims here, of course, but also women.
One of the most offensive things about European political conduct is the tendency to waste taxpayers' money, and there can be no doubt the problem is around cases like these somewhere, where it ends up in the wrong hands, for all the wrong reasons.
Labels: anti-semitism, dhimmitude, France, islam, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, terrorism
At a [year] 1937 [CE] lecture to the British
Foreign Ministry, the King of Saudi Arabia said:
“Verily, the word of Allah teaches us,
and we implicitly believe this...
for a Muslim to kill a Jew...
ensures him immediate entry into Heaven...”
SOURCE: The Holocaust’s Most Vicious Killers
by Edwin Black, The Jewish Press, 2011/1/21, pages 1 and 91.
PERSONAL COMMENT:
Notice that those words were spoken BEFORE
year 1967 CE and BEFORE year 1948 CE.
===================================
Louis René Beres said:
“For Hamas, the Israeli enemy is more
than just a geo-strategic opponent.
It is, rather, a delegated religious target
slated for annihilation, one whose obligatory
and violent elimination will confer blessedly
eternal life upon the Islamic sacrificer”.
SOURCE:
Radical Islam: Terrorism as Power Over Death
by Louis René Beres, 2019 January 3
www.algemeiner.com/2019/01/03/radical-islam-terrorism-as-power-over-death/
===================================
Professor A.J. Caschetta said:
“The truth is that no amount
of respect will satisfy Islamists.
Since the end of World War II, U.S.
policy makers have nearly always sided
with Muslims against their enemies.
For decades, U.S. administrations sided
with Muslim Pakistan over Hindu India.
U.S. power and technology liberated
Afghanistan from the Soviet Union,
Kuwait from Iraq, and Bosnia and Kosovo
from Yugoslavia.
Americans have fought—and some have died—
to save starving Muslims in Somalia
and flooded Muslims in Indonesia.
In 1982, U.S. power even saved
the loathsome PLO from destruction
by Israel in Lebanon.
And, in spite of all this, the United States
remains the No. 1 target of Islamic supremacists.
U.S. policymakers should recognize that
no act of kindness, no amount of aid
and no military rescue mission will
ever be enough to appease Islamists.”
SOURCE:
While 2018 was a good year for Islamists,
2019 is looking even better
by A.J. Caschetta, 2019 January 11
www.jns.org/opinion/while-2018-was-a-good-year-for-islamists-2019-is-looking-even-better/
MICROBIOGRAPHY:
A.J. Caschetta is a Ginsburg-Ingerman
fellow at the Middle East Forum
and a principal lecturer at
the Rochester Institute of Technology.