King Charles' dhimmitude for Easter
The king of Britain has once again demonstrated how he sells out to the Religion of Peace, this time on holidays, where he couldn't deliver a sermon without mentioning the ideology he too played a part in foisting upon his country:
It's good to see the Federalist has published something critical of the Religion of Peace, but I wish they'd leave religions like the Sikh out of this, if only because in contrast to Islam, I don't think Sikhism is problematic, and if you know where to look, there are religions that may not be monotheistic that can still be worth respecting if they have positive and civilized values to offer. What matters for now is that the UK's monarchy is continuing the sellout to Islam, which is being forced upon the country even at the expense of Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus and other such religions of the far east. Food for thought.
And calling Islam "caring"? After October 7, 2023 in Israel, it's painfully obvious that's not the case.
When King Charles III finally issued a statement celebrating Easter, he couldn’t keep himself from mentioning Islam. Before he even described the Christian meaning of Easter, he praised Islam and other religions for “caring for the stranger and those in need.”I would just like to point out though, that to celebrate a holiday originally from India is not a bad thing, and is far from being a poor choice as it is when the king starts gushing over a religion of barbarism like Islam. On which note, one of the reasons it gained such a foothold in the UK is because:
The king — the head of the Church of England and “defender of the faith” — neglected to celebrate Palm Sunday, which commences Holy Week, as The Federalist previously reported. Instead, he honored the Sikh holiday of Vaisakhi.
The United Kingdom has become increasingly secularized, while the Church of England has watered down its beliefs on biblical issues like sexuality. Meanwhile, King Charles III has been paving the way for religions foreign to the nation’s Western heritage.More specifically, what the Church of England watered down was its stance on LGBT ideology. Which Islam, by sharp contrast, you can be sure will not be obligated to do, as that's the real "protected class" movement in the UK, and demonstrates how classism is another serious problem.
Cries of “Allahu akbar” echoed through the halls of Windsor Castle in March, as the king hosted Muslim festivities ahead of Ramadan. The king even helped package dates for the Islamic holiday.
It's good to see the Federalist has published something critical of the Religion of Peace, but I wish they'd leave religions like the Sikh out of this, if only because in contrast to Islam, I don't think Sikhism is problematic, and if you know where to look, there are religions that may not be monotheistic that can still be worth respecting if they have positive and civilized values to offer. What matters for now is that the UK's monarchy is continuing the sellout to Islam, which is being forced upon the country even at the expense of Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus and other such religions of the far east. Food for thought.
And calling Islam "caring"? After October 7, 2023 in Israel, it's painfully obvious that's not the case.
Labels: Christianity, dhimmitude, islam, jihad, londonistan, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism
