Tel-Chai Nation

If there's something I decidedly will have to comment on now, it's how Israel retains relations with Azerbaijan, a country that's brutalized Armenia, yet the Israeli government hasn't taken that into consideration, and now Netanyahu is paying them a visit:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to pay an official visit to Baku in the first half of May, where he will meet with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. The visit was first reported by Israel Hayom.

The talks are expected to focus on several key regional and bilateral issues. Chief among them is the ongoing Israeli-Turkish dialogue, facilitated by Azerbaijan, regarding Syria. The agenda will also include discussions on Azerbaijan potentially joining the Abraham Accords, particularly in the economic and commercial spheres, and ways to further deepen bilateral relations between Israel and Azerbaijan, as well as their ties with the United States and Central Asia.

The planned meeting follows recent diplomatic activity in the region, including the visit of US envoy Steve Witkoff to Baku and an Israeli-Turkish negotiation round also hosted there. This flurry of diplomatic engagement comes amid a backdrop of high-level regional contacts, including a public letter of thanks from former US President Donald Trump to President Aliyev for Azerbaijan's role in mediation efforts, and successive meetings between Aliyev and the presidents of Turkey and Syria.

Aliyev's active mediation and engagement are turning him into a pivotal diplomatic player, uniquely positioned to bridge divides among various regional actors and contribute to regional stability in the Middle East.

Considering all the abominable behavior Azerbaijan's displayed towards Armenia, I don't think Netanyahu should visit them. I am aware Armenian premier Nikol Pashinyan has angeringly made faustian pacts with Iran, and sold out Arsakh to the Azeris. But that's still no reason to be chummy with Azerbaijan, and assuming the Israeli government is selling weapons to Azerbaijan, that's wrong.

Also note the attendance of Witkoff, who's already disturbed some more realist conservatives, based on his alliances with bad apples, right down to his conversations with Tucker Carlson. That's not very promising either. Again, Witkoff can't remain an envoy, and somebody must ask Trump to relieve him of duty.

Labels: anti-semitism, Armenia, dhimmitude, iran, islam, Israel, jihad, Knesset, military, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, syria, terrorism

Despite what the pathetic propagandist Hen Mazzig claimed a few months ago, many Muslims in Gaza have left in the thousands already:

Since the war began, over 36 thousand people have left the Gaza Strip - an unprecedented number, showing a growing emigration trend.

There is a growing wave of emigration from the Gaza Strip, mostly through the Rafah Crossing into Egyptian territory. According to a report by Channel 12, approximately 2,000 of the emigrants left through Israeli territory, some via the Allenby Crossing on the Jordanian border and others via the Ramon Airport to other countries. However, most emigrants have been leaving through the Rafah Crossing, which was reopened for exit only at the beginning of the ceasefire.

According to the report, only specific groups can leave legally: Sick patients who need medical treatment outside of Gaza, civilians with foreign passports, and residents who received visas from other countries that agreed to officially accept them.

Many countries are involved in accepting refugees, some as a temporary destination and others as a permanent solution. Among the outstanding countries are Egypt, Jordan, the UAE, western European countries, and Romania, which especially stood out due to the number of refugees accepted.

Hamas strongly objects to the emigration and sees it as a threat to its control over the territory. According to Hamas spokesmen, the process is in line with the plan that US President Donald Trump proposed to transfer Palestinian Arabs to other countries.

Internet influencers who are affiliated with Hamas have launched media campaigns calling on residents to remain in Gaza, but so far, they have been mostly unsuccessful.

What's only regrettable is if any western European country and an eastern one like Romania could be accepting them, because they don't belong in any civilized area, and are bound to lead to disaster if they remain there. All concerned Europeans should object, and if there's anywhere where the departers from Gaza could go, it's to the Russian sattelite regions like Dagestan and Chechnya, the latter which as noted before, has accepted evacuees already.

All that aside, this is good to see they're leaving an area they don't deserve to be in after what they, like the Hamas itself, were willing participants in on October 7, 2023. But they don't belong in civilized European and Asian countries either.

Labels: anti-americanism, anti-semitism, dhimmitude, Egypt, immigration, islam, Israel, jihad, jordan, Knesset, military, misogyny, Moonbattery, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, UAE, United States, war on terror, White House

This year marks the 110th since Turkey committed the Armenian Genocide during WW1, a horrifying history that Turkey and even Azerbaijan still won't clearly acknowledge and definitely haven't apologized for:

April 24 marked the 110th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, during which up to 1.5 million Armenians were killed by the Ottman Empire.

Tensions always rise between the Armenians and the modern Turkish government at this time of year, and many Armenians are now taking time during the day to reflect on Azerbaijan’s ethnic cleansing of Armenians from the Nagorno-Karabakh region in late 2023.

Modern historians look upon the events of 1915-1916 as the first of several genocidal events in the 20th Century, while Turkey disputes the allegation that its Ottoman predecessors were attempting to systematically eliminate the Armenian people, as Nazi Germany would later treat the Jews, or the Hutus of Rwanda would treat the Tutsis.

[...] There were numerous international witnesses to these atrocities, including foreign reporters and military officers. Modern Turkish politicians are generally willing to admit that Armenian civilians were killed and abused in great numbers, but they insist there is no documented proof that the Ottoman government was deliberately trying to exterminate the entire Armenian people.

The Armenians say the Ottomans wanted to eliminate them because they were an inconvenient Christian people standing in the way of the Young Turks’ vision for a mighty Turkic empire that would stretch from the Caucasus all the way to China.

[...] Many Armenians today accuse Azerbaijan of ethnic cleansing – eliminating a people by forcibly relocating them, rather than murdering them all – after its military conquest of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region in 2023.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a swath of territory that fell inside the borders of Azerbaijan after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but most of its inhabitants were ethnic Armenians, who had dwelled in the area they called the “Republic of Artsakh” for centuries, ever since the height of the greater Armenian kingdom.

If the aforementioned Hen Mazzig were really concerned about forced relocation, he would've taken up topics like this, and thrown his support behind the community that really needs backing, here being Armenia's. Instead, he took the side of the savages.

Writing at the Christian Post last Sunday, religious freedom advocate David Curry urged the U.S. government to hold Azerbaijan accountable for abusing Armenians and other Christians, including the ethnic and religious cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh.

The above columnist is absolutely correct. And it's vital to note that Armenia's current premier has to shoulder blame for much of what's befallen the country lately:

Some in the Armenian diaspora have criticized the government of Armenia for stepping back from its efforts to get the other nations of the world to formally recognize the 1915 genocide, in part because the government believes it is making diplomatic progress with Turkey and Azerbaijan.

In March, Armenian President Nikol Pashinyan told Turkish reporters that obtaining international recognition of the Armenian Genocide “is not among our foreign policy priorities today.” He hinted that insisting on recognition of the event was an obstacle to signing a treaty with Azerbaijan or normalizing relations with Turkey.

So not only did he allow Azerbaijan to take over Arsakh without a genuine fight, he's also selling out on the issue of recognition of a serious issue. This too is very chilling, and Pashinyan doesn't deserve to be a politician.

Here's some more history (via The Daily Wire) of some of the most obscene incidents during tragedy:

While the death toll is in dispute, photographs from the era document some mass killings. Some show Ottoman soldiers posing with severed heads, others with them standing amid skulls in the dirt. The victims are reported to have died in mass burnings and by drowning, torture, gas, poison, disease and starvation. Children were reported to have been loaded into boats, taken out to sea and thrown overboard. Rape, too, was frequently reported.

Just one more reason it's a disgrace anybody lets countries governed by the Religion of Peace off the hook. Of course, CNN is still making things worse by using that line "death toll in dispute". It is most definitely not.

Labels: Armenia, Christianity, dhimmitude, islam, jihad, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism

About 2 months ago, the leftist homosexual journalist Hen Mazzig, who already did something bad enough by attacking Abigail Shrier for defending girls, Jewish or otherwise, from LGBT operations similar to the violence Hamas committed on October 7, 2023, wrote apologia for Muslims in Gaza in the Jewish Exponent where he says they shouldn't be "displaced" from the Gaza strip, obscuring that they disqualified themselves of the privilege of remaining:

I grew up on stories of exile. My family was forced out of Iraq and Tunisia for being Jewish — homes stolen, communities erased and history rewritten. To this day, too many people insist it was “voluntary migration,” as if nearly a million Jews in Arab lands simply woke up one morning and decided to leave behind centuries of roots, culture and history.

I’ve spent years pushing back against that erasure, making it clear that my family — and so many others — were forced to leave. And yet, today, I see a disturbing echo of that same denial. The same people who overlooked Mizrahi Jews’ suffering are now casually advocating for the forced displacement of Palestinians as “the only option” to deal with Hamas’ terror.

I get the disgusted feeling he's implying right-wingers "overlooked" eastern Jews' plight? Well that's awfully rich coming from somebody who doesn't seem to have much respect for women. This certainly obscures how the Menachem Begin government did its best to help people of such backgrounds, and suggests Mr. Mazzig's political leanings are impeding his ability to appreciate that. Of course, it's also possible he's implying the left as of now is advocating for moving out what Mazzig blatantly calls "palestianians", and can't stand if anybody on his end of the spectrum is supporting what's best worked on, which is to send away products of Islamic indoctrination who tragically were all on Hamas' side 2 years before, to a distance that would be best remained at.

Reactions to President Donald Trump’s statement last week about removing Palestinians from Gaza ranged from some voices applauding it as a necessary step — one online commentator even told me it was time to “try something new to solve this conflict” — to anti-Israel activists using it as “evidence” of Israeli intentions, to extremists on both sides seizing it to justify their absolutist solutions for this conflict.

I see things differently, because I don’t have to imagine what forced displacement does to a people. I see it in my own family, even 75 years later. My grandmother still speaks of Baghdad — not just as a city, but as her other homeland that was taken from her. The trauma of being uprooted never left her, nor did the deep pain of knowing that an entire world of Jewish life in Iraq was erased in a single generation. Yes, we rebuilt. Yes, Israel gave my family refuge. But what was lost can never be fully regained.

This is what’s missing from the argument that Palestinians would be “better off” leaving Gaza — that they would have safer, more comfortable lives if they were resettled elsewhere. It’s the same logic that was used to justify the expulsion of Jews from Arab lands. And while my family may have found security in Israel, that doesn’t mean the original trauma was justified. Nor does it account for the cultural and communal annihilation that came with it.

This entirely obscures the evils of Islam, which I sadly guess Mr. Mazzig isn't even the slightest bit willing to acknowledge, and even if he studied the Koran's contents, chances are it makes no difference to him. He continues with his shoddy obfuscations:

The destruction of Gaza under Hamas’ rule is undeniable. But forced displacement doesn’t solve that problem — it only ensures that the pain and resentment of this war will last for generations. I am not blind to the fact that anti-Zionists today demand the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel. Not only is that hateful, but it fundamentally denies the Jewish people’s historic connection to the land of Israel. That’s racism. And it’s unacceptable.

Indeed, the loudest voices in the “Free Palestine” movement aren’t calling for a two-state solution. They’re not talking about peace. They want Israel gone. They want Jewish sovereignty erased. They don’t see Oct. 7 as an atrocity — they see it as a model.

But you don’t fight anti-Zionist eliminationism with eliminationist rhetoric of your own. You don’t counter the fantasy of erasing Israel by proposing the same for Gaza.

That’s not strength. That’s surrender — to the idea that this is a zero-sum war where one side must be erased for the other to survive.

And I guess it's weakness to look for the cause of the hatred driving Muslim adherents, right?

I am not talking about efforts — if they exist — to give Gazans who wish to seek refuge elsewhere the ability to do so. That is their right. I am talking about the fantasy that all Palestinians in Gaza will be wiped out or relocated to some as-yet-undetermined place, as if that were a serious solution.

Of course, the plan to displace Gazans that Trump floated, alongside Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week, is unlikely to end up getting carried out.

Let’s be honest: Relocating Palestinians from Gaza is never going to happen. No Arab country will get on board. Saudi Arabia rushed to release a statement making it clear they won’t normalize relations with Israel without a Palestinian state. Egypt and Jordan have always said they won’t take in Palestinians from Gaza. No American administration — least of all one that ran on ending wars and tightening borders — will commit troops to enforce it or open the gates to Palestinian refugees.

This is political theater.

And this is defeatism on Mazzig's part. Mainly because the Jordanian king has so far shown the willingness to take in children of families who need medical care, and there are more who'll be relocating to Indonesia. But Mazzig, in all his moral equivalence, won't show any appreciation, will he? And of course, he avoids any reference to the Religion of Peace. He definitely doesn't speak of it negatively. And he doesn't seem particularly interested in making a case for sending a message to Arab countries that they should take in these so-called palestinians, whose very name draws from one given to Israel by the Roman empire, and Mazzig obscures that entirely.

We’ve seen this play before. Netanyahu and Trump previously dangled West Bank annexation only to “concede” it in exchange for the Abraham Accords. Now, Trump is floating this logistical insanity — likely knowing it will never happen — to position himself as the only one who can “negotiate it down.”

But here’s the real danger: While world leaders understand this is just bluster, the people watching — especially online — think it’s real. And that’s a serious threat to us.

Because Mr. Mazzig wants it to be. He's obviously anti-Trump, just like he's anti-Netanyahu. And if he thinks western conservatives are the root cause of all evil, and can't acknowledge even liberals make mistakes, that's just the problem Mazzig has failed to prove he can rise above.

Because when these extreme ideas enter the mainstream, they don’t just fade away. They stick. They fuel conspiracies. They get used to paint all Jews as complicit in a plan that doesn’t even exist. And once again, we become the scapegoat.

Political leaders pushing these ideas aren’t protecting Jews. They’re making us targets. Jews deserve better than to be associated with unrealistic, cruel proposals that will almost certainly never happen but will absolutely be used against us.

And if there’s one thing I know from my family’s history, it’s that displacement only creates new wounds; it does not heal old ones. The Jews who were expelled from Arab lands never found justice, and Palestinians won’t either if they are forcibly removed from Gaza.

Hamas started this war. Hamas is responsible for this war. But the people in Gaza shouldn’t have to pay for a tyranny that rules over them with an iron fist. Many of them, as we’ve seen from footage throughout this war, oppose Hamas and do not want to live under their control.

And we deserve better than to have leftists like Mazzig lecture us with cowardice. This reeks of blood libels anti-Israel propagandists use, to imply that Israel is literally guilty of tyrannizing Gazans entirely without justification. And ignores all the barbaric acts committed in the name of the Religion of Peace, to say nothing of how many Muslims in Gaza were indoctrinated with Hitler's Mein Kamph, translated into Arabic. That Mazzig apparently obscured such horrific discoveries speaks volumes, and the same goes for how he obscures the celebrations the Gazan Muslims had after October 7, 2023. The Islamofascists in Gaza also celebrated September 11, 2001, and Mazzig doesn't dwell on that either. What does that say about what kind of person Mr. Mazzig is?

The more we entertain the idea that one side must be erased for the other to live, the further we get from any future that isn’t defined by endless war.

There are no magic wands here. No shortcuts. And no amount of forced migration — of Jews or Palestinians — will bring the peace we all deserve.

The only way forward is to dismantle Hamas, empower Palestinian leaders who reject extremism and invest in a long-term solution where both peoples can live with security, dignity and self-determination — without adding to the traumas that must be overcome another episode of ethnic cleansing like what my family experienced.

And the more we vehmently refuse to discuss the content of the Koran/Hadith, and vehemently refuse to acknowledge that the modern claim of a "palestinian state" was an anti-Israel fabrication, the less likely we are to solve a terrible problem. Oh, and has Mr. Mazzig ever spoken in defense of black Africans who were victim of Islamofascism in Africa? Or victims of honor murders? He also doesn't seem particularly concerned about Islamic hostility to homosexuality, this despite Mazzig himself being homosexual. He also obscures how Gaza is really Israeli land, and this makes him no better than say, the phony conservative Ed Morrissey.

Mazzig has only proven himself one of the biggest hinderances to Israel, and if he hasn't apologized to the aforementioned Shrier, that's another serious error he's made.

Labels: anti-americanism, anti-semitism, dhimmitude, islam, Israel, jihad, lgbt cultism, military, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, United States, war on terror

Miri Regev, the government minister who already made a farce of herself by wearing a modest dress in the UAE a number of years ago, has now additionally embarrassed her right-wing standings by inviting Dana International, the transsexual Israeli singer, to attend the Israeli Independence Day ceremony:

Minister Miri Regev, who is overseeing the official state Israeli Independence Day events, has notified the singer Dana International that she has been selected to light a torch at the official opening ceremony of the holiday on Mount Herzl.

Regev's office stated, "Dana International, an international singer and cultural icon, was a trailblazer and brought Israel to victory in the 1998 Eurovision with the song 'Diva.' Beyond her musical achievements, Dana became a symbol of acceptance, equality, and pride, and led a change in perceptions regarding the LGBT community and gender in Israel and around the world."

Minister Regev stated: "Dana International is a groundbreaking figure, one of the most beloved singers in Israel, and one of the most successful in the world, who contributed a lot to promoting values of tolerance and acceptance in Israeli society. Choosing Dana to light a torch is a recognition of her special contribution and her ability to unite hearts around the values of equality and mutual respect."

The decision was met with opposition by those in conservative circles due to International (whose real name is Sharon Cohen) being transgender.

Note though, that Israel National News isn't helping by using female pronouns, when here, they could be sending a much clearer message and showing some courage by referring to this pretentious singer according to his biological sex. For now, this is an utter humiliation, right down to how Regev uses left-wing style talking points, and Dana did not change any perceptions, in Israel or anywhere else. What is clear is that Dana is an embarrassment with what he's taken up, and even the feminine name becomes an embarrassment as a result.

In a Hebrew opinion column in Arutz Sheva, Itamar Segal attacked the decision, saying he could not watch the ceremony since partakeing in the ceremony is "something no less than an idol in the Temple - a man, a singer who decided he's a woman, an Israel 'trailblazer' to one of the biggest crazinesses known to mankind since it appeared on earth. Anyone who is familiar with this phenomenon from up-close and knows what it means and its the consequences, even before the halachic prohibition and the Torah's outlook, knows how crazy and bad it is, and how it is chametz that must be destroyed from this earth so it is not seen or found."

He added: "What will we do with the shame if a minister in a right-wing government is the one to decide on such a disgrace?"

This is another ill-advised attempt by an Israeli delegate to "prove" to the non-Jewish world they're not against specific ideologies, not even Islam, even though the Religion of Peace is hostile to LGBT ideology. It's a very sad example of how some on the right have tripped all over themselves in attempts to convince antisemites to change their opinion, which is not going to be the case. And Regev even hurt women's dignity almost a decade ago, by supporting "modest dress" at government-sponsored concerts, which beggars the query: women dressing skimpily is bad, but LGBT practices are completely okay? That's what has since come to be known as wokeness, and now Regev has really shown some true colors.

At the same time, many of those on the left voiced criticism of the singer's decision to agree to attend the event organized by the government, which they despise, and in light of the fact that International herself called on fellow LGBT singer Ivri Lider not to participate in last year's event to protest the fact that the hostages were not released.

The singer responded to the criticism, writing on social media: "Regarding the hostages -there is no bigger pain than this. Since the war began, I've been screaming this at every possible place. During the first year of the war, I could bring myself to get up on stage. I canceled my Purim concert because I felt I couldn't. We live many long months in this tragedy, and we try to function, live, and scream.

"Last year, I published a post calling on Ivri Lider not to go to the ceremony while there are still hostages. That's how I felt then. I admit that now, it doesn't sound good. Should I tell you what excites me the most now? That I'm going to hug Eli Sharabi and Emily Damari, who during last year's ceremony were in captivity and this year will stand on the stage to light a torch. How we've waited for this moment, for them to be here. Together with them, we will make heard the voice that calls for them all to be released - until the last hostage."

Among the others invited to light a torch at the ceremony is Jewish-American political commentator Ben Shapiro, who is known to often criticize the transgender community. In this regard, Dana International quipped: "I want to see from up close who this Shapiro guy is."

I hope he's not going to go easy on Dana International just because he's Israeli. And while the singer may support efforts to free hostages, that doesn't make his lifestyle practice any more legitimate. I myself would rather not watch this year's Independence Day ceremony as a result of this wokefest that does hurt Israel's common sense image, and what Regev did does not need to be done just to send a message to Islam's monsters, who happen to have double-standards on LGBT practice as it is.

Labels: anti-semitism, dhimmitude, islam, Israel, jihad, Knesset, lgbt cultism, misogyny, Moonbattery, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, war on terror

The following news has promise for a country that's been turned into a canary in a coal mine by the import of Islamofascism:

A record number of adults in France are expected to have received baptism across the country on Easter, primarily driven by young people joining the Catholic Church.

Some 10,384 adults in France are scheduled to be baptized between Saturday evening and Easter Sunday, according to the Conference of Bishops of France (CEF). This comes on top of an additional 7,404 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 expected to receive baptism this week.

The CEF stated that the record numbers were driven in large part by people under the age of 25, with a 45 per cent increase among adults compared to last year, and a 33 per cent rise among adolescents. This can partially be explained by the fact that fewer babies are being baptized by their parents, and thus, there are more teens and young adults who can request the sacrament.

[...] Fourquet argued that the 2013 law allowing for same sex marriage in France had fundamentally disrupted the “civilizational framework” and sparked a strong mobilisation of Catholics against the modern trends on sexuality. He also said that the spate of Islamist terror attacks starting in 2015 in France had caused many to view their country as a Christian land under attack.

Finally, the political scientist surmised that the 2019 fire at the Notre-Dame de Paris cathedral in Paris was taken as an omen from God to return to the church.

This is a good sign, and I think any French who think Judaism's got potential should be invited to take it up too, provided no dress codes are required, if anything. Providing a positive image of religion for women can be very encouraging.

Labels: Christianity, dhimmitude, France, islam, jihad, lgbt cultism, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, war on terror

And without a doubt, this was never the first time. For now, it's sad to see that not only is this overrated police TV franchise still on the air, but now, it's doing law enforcement a horrible disservice in its view of illegal immigrants in the USA:

Law & Order often likes to claim that its dramas are “ripped from the headlines” and that they portray dramatized versions of actual news in America today. But, as is often the case, the series strayed from reality to portray a more woke, left-wing version of current events, not what is really going on today.

With illegal alien crime stories hitting the news all across the country — such as the murder of Rachel Morin, who was raped and murdered by an illegal from El Salvador — and with constant headlines about rape, drug dealing, and gang activity in big city migrant shelters, Law & Order decided to go in a different direction on Thursday.

The episode in question, “Play with Fire (Part 1),” opened with two women quietly talking about migrant women being raped, but their conversation was interrupted by an ICE raid, Newsbusters reported.

A few scenes later, one of the women is found raped and murdered in a nearby warehouse. The episode reveals that the woman was not a migrant but was instead an undercover cop who was working to catch a rapist preying on migrant women. The victim had also been investigating a comparable rape and murder that occurred earlier.

Eventually, officers do discover the identity of the rapist and murderer. And it turns out, it wasn’t another migrant but instead a police officer, specifically the victim’s own lieutenant. The officer was portrayed as using his position of power to sexually assault migrant women who were afraid to speak out for fear of deportation.

I've heard enough. It's okay to focus on police officials who commit criminal offenses, but to do it at the expense of real life facts and common sense is another. This is just plain repulsive, and proves the leftists who produce what could be described as an early form of wokeness when it first premiered 35 years ago have no intention of stopping their repeated desecrations of real life victims of crime. When will the whole franchise be cancelled already? It's been broadcast for far too long now.

Labels: anti-americanism, immigration, misogyny, Moonbattery, racism, sexual violence, showbiz, United States

The king of Britain has once again demonstrated how he sells out to the Religion of Peace, this time on holidays, where he couldn't deliver a sermon without mentioning the ideology he too played a part in foisting upon his country:

When King Charles III finally issued a statement celebrating Easter, he couldn’t keep himself from mentioning Islam. Before he even described the Christian meaning of Easter, he praised Islam and other religions for “caring for the stranger and those in need.”

The king — the head of the Church of England and “defender of the faith” — neglected to celebrate Palm Sunday, which commences Holy Week, as The Federalist previously reported. Instead, he honored the Sikh holiday of Vaisakhi.

I would just like to point out though, that to celebrate a holiday originally from India is not a bad thing, and is far from being a poor choice as it is when the king starts gushing over a religion of barbarism like Islam. On which note, one of the reasons it gained such a foothold in the UK is because:

The United Kingdom has become increasingly secularized, while the Church of England has watered down its beliefs on biblical issues like sexuality. Meanwhile, King Charles III has been paving the way for religions foreign to the nation’s Western heritage.

Cries of “Allahu akbar” echoed through the halls of Windsor Castle in March, as the king hosted Muslim festivities ahead of Ramadan. The king even helped package dates for the Islamic holiday.

More specifically, what the Church of England watered down was its stance on LGBT ideology. Which Islam, by sharp contrast, you can be sure will not be obligated to do, as that's the real "protected class" movement in the UK, and demonstrates how classism is another serious problem.

It's good to see the Federalist has published something critical of the Religion of Peace, but I wish they'd leave religions like the Sikh out of this, if only because in contrast to Islam, I don't think Sikhism is problematic, and if you know where to look, there are religions that may not be monotheistic that can still be worth respecting if they have positive and civilized values to offer. What matters for now is that the UK's monarchy is continuing the sellout to Islam, which is being forced upon the country even at the expense of Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus and other such religions of the far east. Food for thought.

And calling Islam "caring"? After October 7, 2023 in Israel, it's painfully obvious that's not the case.

Labels: Christianity, dhimmitude, islam, jihad, londonistan, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism

USA vice president J.D Vance says Europe shouldn't have been made into a security vassal of the USA after WW2:

The United States was wrong to neuter European power and create vassal states in the 1950s through events like the Suez crisis, Vice President JD Vance has said.

Europe and the United States are indivisible because of their shared culture and history, but Vice President Vance argued in an interview with Unherd that Europe’s relationship is best served by being more self-reliant and even resisting America’s direction of travel when bad decisions are being made.

He told the publication: “It’s not good for Europe to be the permanent security vassal of the United States”.

The Trump White House, particularly Vance, has been open about its qualms about the very real deficiencies in European defence and their position as effective American security clients.

Yet these latest remarks are noteworthy because, until now, not much has been said about how this state of affairs came to be and that it was created largely at the behest of the United States. Vance now says he recognises this as a mistake of previous and historic administrations.

Read more at the article. There is a valid point here that it didn't help Europe in the long run - most definitely not today at a time when Islamofascism's become such a chilling problem everywhere there - and that the continent's democratic governments should've been encouraged to be more self-reliant. Not to mention should've been encouraged to take up law systems emulating the USA's, but it's not like FDR was ever respectable of that idea, considering how pretentious he revealed himself to be during WW2. Now, because of all those double-standards, the world's become a dangerous place and will be harder than ever to repair.

Labels: dhimmitude, Europe, islam, jihad, terrorism, United States, US Congress, war on terror, White House

Robert Spencer comments on the impending deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, the Muslim from Syria who incited anti-Israel violence at Columbia university:

The Trump administration and all patriotic Americans won a big victory recently when a judge ruled that pro-Hamas agitator Mahmoud Khalil, who has become the latest hater of America to become a darling of the left, can lawfully be deported.

It was a classic case of the leftist media giving the public a false impression, and of a judge, along with that same media, once again underestimating the Trump administration. The establishment media has been hysterically insisting for weeks now that Khalil was in danger in being deported solely because he expressed views that Trump and his administration disliked. Leftist propagandists — that is, the New York Times, CNN, the Washington Post, and the rest — have been claiming that Khalil is the victim of a dictator-in-the-making who wants to destroy the freedom of speech.

And so, Judge Jamee E. Comans, a Louisiana immigration judge, peremptorily gave the federal government exactly 24 hours to provide her with its evidence against Khalil. If she deemed this evidence to be insufficient, she said, “then I am going to terminate the case on Friday.” Marc Van Der Hout, one of Khalil’s large army of attorneys, claimed that “the government has not produced a single shred of evidence to date to support any of its allegations or charges in this case including its outrageous position that Mahmoud’s mere presence and activities in this country have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.”

After seeing the evidence that the government provided, however, on Friday, Comans did not terminate the case against Khalil. Instead, she ruled that Khalil could indeed be deported. The Associated Press reported that Comans “said at the conclusion of a hearing in Jena that the government’s contention that Khalil’s presence in the United States posed ‘potentially serious foreign policy consequences’ was enough to satisfy requirements for his deportation. Comans said the government had ‘established by clear and convincing evidence that he is removable.’”

As you no doubt expect, this isn’t the end of the matter: “Lawyers for Khalil are expected to appeal. And a federal judge in New Jersey has temporarily barred Khalil’s removal from the country.” Nonetheless, the fact that Comans ruled in the administration’s favor is a massive triumph for Trump in his efforts to restore sanity to immigration policy and remove from the country all those who take advantage of America’s hospitality and generosity to work against its interests.

Obviously, all concerned must remain vigilant if we're to ensure men like Khalil will be deported. For now, this is important news, and also reveals just how much bad backing the defendant has when it comes to lawyers.

Labels: anti-americanism, anti-semitism, dhimmitude, immigration, islam, Israel, jihad, military, misogyny, Moonbattery, New York, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, syria, terrorism, United States, war on terror