If Muslim "refugees" continue to practice the same, they should not be admitted as refugees anymore
Hugh Fitzgerald at Dhimmi Watch writes a good argument about why so-called refugees from Islamic countries who continue to practice the Islamic religion themselves cannot be admitted into democratic countries if they're only going to abuse the very welcome they recieved. Just look at how in Lewiston, Maine, Somali "immigrants" have been doing this, for example.
To allow any such refugees, man, woman and child, into the western countries, it must be according to conditions that ensure they recognize the laws of their host country, and perhaps that they even abandon their so-called faith. Only that way will allowing such refugees into democratic countries make sense and work well.
To allow any such refugees, man, woman and child, into the western countries, it must be according to conditions that ensure they recognize the laws of their host country, and perhaps that they even abandon their so-called faith. Only that way will allowing such refugees into democratic countries make sense and work well.
Labels: islam