The bad Ban Ki-Moonbat
The American Thinker minces no words in what they think of the UN's secretary-general, Ban Ki-Moon:
Update: Eli Yishai of the Shas party slammed Ban Ki-Moonbat.
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon portrays Israel and the terrorists who seek its destruction as morally equivalent-but the news gets even worse.No other explanation is needed. Ban Ki-Moonbat is no different from countless other UN corruptocrats in a farcical movement that should have been disbanded long ago.
The Associated Press reported on Dec. 29 that Ban "again condemned Israel's excessive use of force...'All this must stop. Both Israel and Hamas must halt their acts of violence and take all necessary measures to avoid civilian casualties. A ceasefire must be declared immediately. They must also curb their inflammatory rhetoric...'"
To be "evenhanded" between terrorists and a nation they target is appalling--but the UN chief even falls short of this evenhandedness, as was dramatically revealed during his 2007 Mideast visit when he laid a wreath of white flowers on the grave of serial killer Yasir Arafat and met with the parents of young Palestinians serving time in prison for terrorism.
He did not lay wreaths on the graves of Arafat's victims, nor did he meet with their families.
If Ban Ki-moon is not infected by the world's most ancient form of bigotry, what other explanation is there for his behavior?
Update: Eli Yishai of the Shas party slammed Ban Ki-Moonbat.
Labels: anti-semitism, islam, Israel, terrorism, UN corruption
