Sarah Palin defends Jewish rights to residence in Israel
Published by Avi Green on Friday, November 20, 2009 at 4:07 AM.
The former governor of Alaska has spoken out against Obama's attack on Jewish "settlements":
This is an improvement over a mistake she made in her debate with vice president Joe Biden last year, something I hadn't taken enough notice of at the time, when she stupidly agreed on the notion of stopping Jewish growth, or segregation from Arabs. But she's still got a long way to go, and is going to have to show that she can still hold that standing in any following election she'll have, regardless of what advisors she has, whom I assume in fairness influenced what she said during the election debate.
Former US vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin disagrees with the Obama administration's demand that Israel halt settlement construction, although her reason for that opinion is puzzling to some (or at the least demonstrates she's not familiar with the term "natural growth" that much of the debate has revolved around).I'm afraid J Street has already been exposed as a fraud, getting their funding from Saudi Arabia and George Soros, so they don't carry much weight in their crud.
She told Barbara Walters on ABC's Good Morning America this week that she disagrees with the White House because all the Jews moving to Israel need a place to live.
"I disagree with the Obama administration on that," Palin told Walters. "I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don't think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand."
J Street responded by releasing a lengthy statement that condemned Palin's comments and accused her of pandering and ignorance.
"Palin's pandering to her right-wing base comes at the expense of the security of the State of Israel, the lives of those actually living the conflict, and the fundamental American interest in achieving a two-state solution in the near term," it said. "Her words reveal a glaring ignorance of damaging facts and a callous disregard of past and present US policy."
This is an improvement over a mistake she made in her debate with vice president Joe Biden last year, something I hadn't taken enough notice of at the time, when she stupidly agreed on the notion of stopping Jewish growth, or segregation from Arabs. But she's still got a long way to go, and is going to have to show that she can still hold that standing in any following election she'll have, regardless of what advisors she has, whom I assume in fairness influenced what she said during the election debate.
Labels: Israel, United States
