Memphis Commercial Appeal is not relevant
Patrick Poole writes about how a reporter for the Memphis Commercial Appeal contradicted a report he'd written about how Mohammed al-Hanooti, an imam from Washington DC with ties to terror funding, was going to make an appearance at a mosque in Elvis' city. This has continued even after the local FBI branch confirmed they had info that al-Hanooti was going to arrive. Poole tried to contact reporter Michael Lollar to ask why he was never contacted, and how about that, the alleged journalist wouldn't even give him an answer, which seems standard practice for such apologists.
I used to read the Commercial Appeal years ago, at a time when I really didn't consider how bad they could be, or are. Today, I wouldn't recommend them under any circumstances, and any residents of Memphis who'd rather not be suckered by apologia and fudging should cancel their subscriptions and not pay a dime for such a cruddy paper.
I used to read the Commercial Appeal years ago, at a time when I really didn't consider how bad they could be, or are. Today, I wouldn't recommend them under any circumstances, and any residents of Memphis who'd rather not be suckered by apologia and fudging should cancel their subscriptions and not pay a dime for such a cruddy paper.
Labels: islam, msm foulness, terrorism, United States
