UN bigwig is a 9-11 truther

Big Peace reports about the outrage Richard Falk, an alleged human rights activist for the UN, caused with his own accusation that the US engineered the attacks in 9-11. Falk said the following:

Falk wrote in his personal blog on January 11 that there are "awkward gaps and contradictions in the official explanations" given for the attacks when hijacked jets crashed into the World Trade Center towers in New York and the Pentagon in Washington.

He said there was "an apparent cover-up" by the US government over its knowledge of the attacks masterminded by Osama bin Laden.

Falk said mainstream US media had been "unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an Al-Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials."

Truly disgusting, but what's really absurd is that, if you know where to look, there may have already been MSMers who've espoused the same 9-11 trutherism that he did. All this does is tell how many leftists of his standing don't respect one another on the whole.

Ban Ki-Moon, awful man he is himself, may have condemed his statements, but cannot fire Falk since he was appointed by the UNHRC. But then isn't that why those with common sense should quit the UN membership?