Wikipedia losing contributors
PC Magazine tells that the online encyclopedia anyone can edit is losing contributors.
It doesn't really matter. Most of what they publish isn't particularly accurate, and since anyone can edit it, they can even tilt it to something untruthful. Including political bias, and the people in charge of the site don't always make an effort to prevent that. In that case, what's the use? Only really good stuff there are some of the pictures, which are certainly a lot more accurate than the text-based stuff is.
It doesn't really matter. Most of what they publish isn't particularly accurate, and since anyone can edit it, they can even tilt it to something untruthful. Including political bias, and the people in charge of the site don't always make an effort to prevent that. In that case, what's the use? Only really good stuff there are some of the pictures, which are certainly a lot more accurate than the text-based stuff is.
Labels: communications
