Apparently, the Jewish community in Canada is blind to the niqab horrors
Barbara Kay's written in the National Post about a lecture she attended given by Salman Rushdie to a Jewish community center who didn't seem to see much of anything wrong with Islamic niqabs:
As for the Haredi take on niqabs and veils, something has to be done to put a stop to it, because if there's a few hundred wearers and indoctrinates now, there could be several thousand more in the future, and that's very bad. Reducing the human body to nothing more than a sexual entity is obscene, and one could argue it's even worse than pornography in its own way.
Rushdie’s insightful and entertaining address on “literature and politics in the modern world” was excellent, but the evening’s most noteworthy moment arrived with the Q&A, when, inevitably, his response was solicited regarding Quebec’s new Bill 62, which bans face coverings in the realm of public services. Rushdie gracefully sidestepped any comment on the law itself, but did express a robust opinion on the niqab.What's bad about this is that other people could come away wondering if today's Jewish community and/or Judaists actually accept evil, selectively or otherwise. And then you wonder how antisemitism comes around, no matter how unjust it is.
His own family, Rushdie said, ranged from atheism to full Islamic practice, but “Not even the religious members would accept wearing a veil. They would say it is an instrument of oppression.” My husband and I applauded loudly, but few others did. Rushdie added, “Muslim women in the West who see it as an expression of identity are guilty of what Karl Marx called ‘false consciousness.’ A lot of women are forced to wear the veil. To choose to wear it, in my view, assists in the oppression of their sisters in those parts of the world.”
At this point I clapped even more enthusiastically and (alone) bellowed, “Bravo!” But most of the audience continued to sit on their hands. To say I was disappointed in my fellow Jews is an understatement. Here, after all, is a man who knows Islamic fundamentalism and oppression first hand, having endured 20 years of tense vigilance following fatwas against his life for the alleged crime of insulting Islam.
The tepid reaction to Rushdie’s statements thus struck me as a rebuke both to Rushdie’s personal ordeal and to the wisdom he brings to the face-covering debate as a critical insider. It’s also proof that even someone of Rushdie’s moral authority is powerless to shift liberal Jews’ reflexive instinct to identify with a perceived underdog, whatever the actual stakes at issue. I even had the sneaking suspicion that if a niqab’d woman in the audience had risen to shake her fist at Rushdie, she would have sparked an approving ovation.
Here’s a thought experiment I’d put to my progressive Jewish friends: How do you feel about the “frumqa”? “Frum” means religious in Yiddish. A frumqa is the Jewish burqa, worn by a few hundred Haredi women in Jerusalem who are sometimes called the “Taliban women.” The frumqa’s creator, Bruria Keren says she wears it “to save men from themselves. A man who sees a woman’s body parts is sexually aroused … Even if he doesn’t sin physically, his impure thoughts are sin in themselves.”Yes, that is peculiar, isn't it? To say nothing of running the gauntlet of making it look like any Jewish community accepts barbarism, no matter how terribly they suffered it themselves, and worst, like they actually consider Islamic anti-semitism fully valid.
I’m glad the frumqa exists for one reason: I can say I find it disturbing in itself and abusive to girls without being called Islamophobic. I can freely say that Haredi fundamentalism and the obsessive gender extremism it incubates is a blot on the Jewish halachic and cultural landscape. Please don’t speak to me of a Jewish woman’s “right” to wear such a travesty of “tzniut” (modesty in dress and behaviour). Indoctrinated women, like inebriated women, are not competent to give informed consent to practices that reduce them to sexual and reproductive “things.”
I’d wager there isn’t a single Jewish woman in that Rushdie audience who wouldn’t privately express her visceral disgust with the frumqa, and who furthermore wouldn’t turn a hair if it were banned in Israel (it can’t be: the Haredim hold too much political power there). But over the Other’s burqas they draw a politically correct veil. Forgive me if I conclude it isn’t just Muslim women in the West who are guilty of false consciousness.
As for the Haredi take on niqabs and veils, something has to be done to put a stop to it, because if there's a few hundred wearers and indoctrinates now, there could be several thousand more in the future, and that's very bad. Reducing the human body to nothing more than a sexual entity is obscene, and one could argue it's even worse than pornography in its own way.
Labels: anti-semitism, Canada, dhimmitude, haredi corruption, islam, londonistan, misogyny, Moonbattery
