Why "reunification" actually makes a better description than "annexation"
0 Comments Published by Avi Green on Thursday, August 06, 2020 at 3:44 AM.
Israel National News has an op-ed explaining why "annexation" is really irrelevant in describing the need to reconnect Judea/Samaria to Israeli sovereignty:
12. The term "annexation” is a pure myth: Israel is not considering annexing any land of a previously existing country. The land in question, is a "disputed land," between Israel and the Arab Palestinians. The State of Israel was willing to relinquish a part of it to the Arab Palestinians, should she get an honest peaceful partner, who will look after the well-being of its citizens and its neighbors.But of course, Israel won't get one, so long as Islam is involved. And "reunification" or "reattachment" sums up the issue far better in terms of logic.
Labels: anti-semitism, islam, Israel, jihad, terrorism
0 Responses to “Why "reunification" actually makes a better description than "annexation"”
Post a Comment