A supposedly religious, married man led a double life in secular homosexuality (and apparently cheated on his wife)
While a religious wife who sued her ex-husband for lying to her about his sexual preference was had her case turned down in court, the following subject can say quite a bit about some male LGBT practitioners and how they treat women, and just how loyal they may or may not be:
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday night that spouses do not have a legal duty to reveal their true sexual preference to their partners.Even so, it was offensive of the hubby to insult his wife's intellect, and take advantage of her parents' money to fund his law firm. He should, by all means, return the money and apologize for any adultery he committed, homosexual or otherwise. For now, this certainly is quite a stupefying case.
In a case in which an ex-wife tried to sue her ex-husband for failing to reveal to her that he was gay and secular instead of heterosexual and religious, as he had represented himself to be over 10 years, a three-justice panel expressed sympathy, but said the judiciary was the wrong forum.
More specifically, the ex-wife demanded the return of various funds her family had provided the couple and the ex-husband under false pretenses.
Essentially, Justices Yael Wilner, Noam Sohlberg and Uzi Vogelman said that there were all kinds of moral problems with the ex-husband having lied to his wife and with him living a double life for a decade, but there was no legal fix.
[...] The couple had been married for around a decade when they divorced in 2016 upon the wife learning that the husband had been living a double life for years: with her as a religious heterosexual and elsewhere as a secular homosexual.
Part of the claims appeared to involve the fact that the wife’s family helped the couple economically in paying for their residence and helped the husband’s business as a lawyer.
The daughter of the couple also joined the wife in the lawsuit.
But ultimately the court said any economic issues were tied up inextricably with the legal decision concerning the couple’s relationship.
While disapproving of the husband’s dishonesty, the court said that the judiciary is not the place to police the dynamics and genuineness of a couple’s promises and intimate issues between each other.
Labels: Israel, Judaism, lgbt cultism, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness
