New York Times turns to gender bigotry by eliminating the word "women" from article about them
As explained here at the American Thinker, one of the most repulsive newspapers still in business is taking up the extreme political correctness of censoring the word "women" from an article about menstruation:
A couple of days ago, the New York Times ran a rather startling article. The subject matter was typical light fare for a lefty magazine because it discussed how today's young women no longer want environmentally unfriendly tampons and pads that get flushed or thrown away when they get a period. No, wait. The article wasn't about "young women" at all — although, biologically, they're the only ones who must deal with periods. Instead, it was about "young people" and "menstruators." That's right: menstruation, which is the signifier of a female becoming sexually mature and, therefore, able to procreate, is no longer connected to women.How much more will it take to convince people the NYT is not worth spending money on? This should be far from a surprise such a far-left publication could do this, but in any event, it's definitely a sign why everyone should save money by avoiding such an insufferable newspaper that's as hostile to women as it is to Israelis and everyone else they despise.
The article's title and subtitle were an early hint that wokedom was ahead: "Menstruation Gets a Gen Z Makeover: Young people want alternatives to disposable tampons and pads — and they're not embarrassed to talk about it." Note the language: not girls, teens, young women, or women, but "people," as if there are any humans on the planet capable of having periods other than women.
Labels: anti-americanism, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness, New York, United States
