Washington Post condemned for comparing reversal of Roe vs. Wade to 9-11
The overturning of the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling would be a “9/11 attack” on the country’s social fabric, according to a recent Washington Post piece arguing that such a move on the part of the “destructive” Supreme Court would devastate Americans.Absolutely. What he did is unspeakably disgusting, and he should issue his apology right in front of 9-11 Families for a Safe America. In fact, so too should the WaPo for permitting this atrocity in the first place and not trying to discourage Milbank or explain why it's in poor taste. The irony is that leftists like Milbank would never condemn Islam for its role in the tragedy, which makes his insult all the more awful.
In an essay published in the Washington Post on Friday, titled “Roe’s impending reversal is a 9/11 attack on America’s social fabric,” Post columnist Dana Milbank warned of “the radical change to society that Justice Samuel Alito and his co-conspirators are poised to ram down the throats of Americans.”
[...] Claiming that “Americans are riled,” Milbank also expressed his hope that voters will “punish Republicans in November for this assault on Americans’ freedom.”
In response, Twitter users blasted the attempt to equate the move to protect unborn children with the infamous attacks by Islamic terrorists that killed nearly three thousand innocents and wounded more than double that number.
“Comparing saving 630,000 lives per year with the murder of 3,000 in a day is probably the most asinine and insulting take I’ve ever seen on Twitter, and that’s saying a lot,” wrote author Jennifer Greenberg.
“You should apologize to the families of 9/11 victims for using their loved one’s deaths for propaganda,” she added.
Let's hope Roe vs. Wade is reversed, which would do considerable justice in saving life, which Milbank's disrespected with his abominable op-eds.
Labels: anti-americanism, dhimmitude, islam, jihad, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness, terrorism, United States