Tel-Chai Nation

So far though, this hasn't been the case:

EU interior ministers met in Stockholm last Thursday [Jan. 26] discuss ways to increase the number of returns of irregular migrants to their countries of origin, including by further restricting the issuance of visas to nationals of “non-cooperative” countries.

"It is clear that in an area without internal borders, we need a Europe-wide policy to deal with asylum and migration issues,” said Belgium’s State Secretary for Asylum and Migration Nicole de Moor (CD&V) before the meeting.

The relevant ministers from national governments met for the first day of informal ministerial talks under the new Swedish EU presidency, which focused on asylum, migration, and home affairs.

For de Moor, it is a question of having “stronger borders, more solidarity between the member states, and a better European return policy, because the subject of return is crucial.

“We need to speak with one voice when addressing nationals of third countries who do not cooperate sufficiently with our return policy,” she insisted.

“We have a very low return rate”

“We see irregular arrivals increasing (…) Returning those who are denied asylum in Europe is a very important issue,” added Swedish Migration Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard.

Of the approximately 340,500 “return” decisions issued across Europe in 2021, just 21 percent were actually implemented, according to Eurostat [...]

Hugh Fitzgerald addressed the issue:

These are not asylum seekers, but economic migrants. Their “movements within the Union” are prompted by the desire to move to the richer countries where welfare benefits are the most generous. Thus, for example, migrants who first land in Italy or Spain or the Balkans will try to move to such rich countries as Germany and Sweden, where a cornucopia of benefits are offered. One way to end this moving about Europe by economic migrants, in order to maximize their benefits, is to pass an EU law requiring migrants to remain in whatever country they first land in for a certain period – say, ten years – no matter how slim the benefits may be.

At least the EU has become sufficiently alarmed about the problem to hold a special meeting to discuss how best to persuade countries of origin to take back those of their citizens whom the countries of the EU wish to expel. That is one sign of sanity breaking out in Europe, after nearly two decades of immigration madness, in which tens of millions of Muslim migrants have either been allowed to enter the EU, or been born to Muslims who had previously been allowed in. Now the civilizational threat posed by so many Muslims, that such intrepid souls as Geert Wilders, Eric Zemmour, and Laurent Obertone, have written about, is beginning to be more widely understood. It is no longer forbidden to discuss this threat. And what has become obvious to many people who for too long had been simply silenced by fear of being tarred as “Islamophobic” needs to be endlessly repeated. It’s one sentence that everyone in the West should fully grasp and memorize: “The large-scale presence of Muslims in Europe has created a situation that is far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous for the indigenous Europeans and for other, non-Muslim, migrants, than would be the case without that large-scale Muslim presence.” Don’t leave home without it.

If you ask me, it should be a badge of honor to be called "Islamophobic" (and also "transphobic", if it matters). The election of figures like Giorgia Meloni in Italy is also a hopeful sign, and they, in example, will hopefully ensure that sanity is eventually restored, and especially safety.

Labels: anti-semitism, dhimmitude, Europe, France, germany, immigration, islam, Italy, jihad, misogyny, Moonbattery, Netherlands, political corruption, racism, Scandanavia, sexual violence, Spain