Geert Wilders is right: when streets turn violent, we must reclaim them

Following riots in France that occurred after a sports match, Geert Wilders has written about the need to take back our streets for safety's sake:

Following a football match, rioters in Paris went on a rampage in the French capital, looting shops setting cars on fire, attacking, even firing at police officers. Videos and television footage showed that many rioters had an immigrant background. It is a scene Europeans have become all too familiar with – not just in France, but all over the continent.

In the past decades, Europe’s ruling elites have allowed millions of immigrants from Africa and the Islamic world to settle in our midst. Some of them hate their host country to the extent that they want to destroy it. They loot and vandalize, assault and rape, and even murder.

Leading politicians – such as Emmanuel Macron in France, Rob Jetten in my own Netherlands, Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels, and many others in their ivory towers – think that people do not notice what is going on. But they do notice, and they are deeply worried. They want the chaos to stop. They also realize the root cause of our societal break-down: Mass immigration by people who contribute absolutely nothing to our societies and reject our cultural values.

While our cities begin to resemble war zones, our governments continue their march of folly. In my country, the authorities want to force literally every municipality in the Netherlands to house a quota of asylum seekers. These fortune seekers, many of whom are young men, are being lodged in hotels, holiday resorts, former schools, former army barracks, even on cruise ships.

I have called on the Dutch people to resist – firmly, but always in a non-violent manner – the establishment of centres for asylum seekers in their neighbourhoods. I have recently begun a nation-wider resistance tour, visiting local communities where the authorities are planning new asylum centres.

The response has been overwhelming. The mainstream media do not report on the protests because the demonstrators are peaceful and law-abiding.

It is not our people who go rampaging in the streets, ravaging their neighbourhoods! We are not conquerors like the thugs in the streets of Paris; we defend our homes. We do not destroy our communities; we love them. We do not loot our neighbours; we protect them. We do not harass and attack our women; we stand up for them.

Well if Donald Trump can perform mass deportations of monsters from the USA, so can European governments, and that's something the public must dedicate itself to demanding now. Wilders is right that something must be done.

British politician Wes Streeting once made threats against Geert Wilders

As questions go about as to whether Keir Starmer will resign from his role as Britain's premier, it's sad to note that one of his challengers is the openly gay Wes Streeting, whom Geert Wilders says once made death threats against him nearly 2 decades back:

One of Britain’s most ambitious politicians, who is lined up to launch a leadership challenge against the Prime Minister as soon as today, previously said he was considering founding a vigilante organisation “to push nasty people under trains,” including prominent Dutch politician Geert Wilders.

Dutch populist Geert Wilders, the so-called “kingmaker” in the last Dutch government and the leader of the Party for Freedom, one of the Netherlands’ largest political parties, responded to the emergence of British Labour politician Wes Streeting as a likely candidate to be the next Prime Minister by recalling Streeting’s publicly expressed fantasies of political murders.

Look what UK Secretary of State for Health & Social Care @wesstreeting wrote about me in 2009. He wanted to push me - a Dutch MP - under a train.

Maybe look at your own crowd first before stopping others entering the UK, @Keir_Starmer, as Labour did with me in 2009 (which… pic.twitter.com/YLF2xrUNDq

— Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv) May 14, 2026

Wilders wrote: “Look what [Streeting] wrote about me in 2009. He wanted to push me – a Dutch MP – under a train”. Wilders published a screenshot of a now-deleted Twitter post where Streeting fantasised about murders, writing of Wilders and a British journalist: “Considering starting my own vigilante org to push nasty people under trains. First up Jan Moir, followed by Geert Wilders…”.

While some may attempt to rationalise away such rhetoric as harmless, death threats towards politicians are not trivial in the Netherlands. Wilders’ predecessor as the figurehead of the Dutch anti-mass migration movement, Pim Fortuyn, was assassinated by a left-wing extremist citing the defence of Islam during the campaign for the 2002 general election. Mr Wilders himself has lived under 24-hour armed police protection since 2004 over frequent threats and actual plots against his life by extremists.

The 2009 threat from Streeting was in response to an article by Jan Moir that some alleged was homophobic, allegations that led to a police and Crown Prosecution Service investigation at the time. Looking back to the episode in a 2024 article, Moir stated that police investigation found the column was not in fact homophobic and that no crime had been committed and decried Streeting’s eventual apology for the repeated threats to throw her under a train as a “pompous, self-serving non-apology… a third-person apology by proxy… a chancer’s masterstroke”.

If Moir were a Muslim, what are the chances he probably wouldn't have taken issue at all? For now, what's clear is that a very irrational man could be on the brink of becoming Starmer's replacement, even though he doesn't deserve the role any more than Ireland's Leo Varadkar, considering all the harm he enabled in the country that also affected LGBT practitioners as well. What this makes clear is that even Britain's losing its common sense in the political realm, and who knows if Streeting will ever convincingly apologize to Wilders?

Winston Churchill's statue in London was vandalized by anti-Israel jihadists

Britain's Islamic nightmare continues as the statue of a war hero was vandalized by what they brought in:

The large bronze statue of British hero and wartime Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill in Parliament Square has again been defaced, this time by ‘pro-Palestine’ attackers.

Winston Churchill’s statue outside Britain’s Houses of Parliament, the national legislature his personality dominated for 40 years as a member, government minister, and two-time Prime Minister has been vandalised overnight. The statue and plinth was painted with messages in red, including “Zionist war criminal”, “free Palestine”, “stop the genocide”, “globalise the Intifada”, and “never again is now”.

A fourth side was tagged in Dutch, with messages including “Groeten uit Den Haag” [‘Greetings from the Hague’], and “Káp Nâh” [‘cut it out’ rendered phonetically for the distinctive “lower-class Hague accent”].

The culprit was arrested. As has been reported here, it was activists from the Netherlands who were responsible for this particular act. And no doubt, they know Churchill spoke out against Islam in his time, in his book The River War. And sadly, for all we know, Keir Starmer will probably let the statue be destroyed and never show any remorse.

Geert Wilders says Europe may need America's help once again to stop the tyrannies it created

Geert Wilders, whose party sadly failed again to win full elections last year, has written for Breitbart that the USA may need to help Europe out of the horrific situation its modern overlords have long sunk it into:

Guess what the main topic of debate at the European Parliament in Strasbourg this week is. It is what the Euro-elites consider the most concerning issue of the moment: “State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States.”

This is a typical example of seeing the speck in your brother’s eye while ignoring the beam in your own. The European Union is criticizing the rule of law in America, while there are indications that Ursula von der Leyen’s European Commission has in the past two years actively tried to interfere in eight parliamentary and presidential elections on the European continent, including twice in my own country, The Netherlands.

That, however, is a topic not deemed worthy of discussion by the European political establishment.

Last week, the House Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Congress published a report about Europe’s decade-long campaign to censor speech. As part of its investigation, the House Committee issued subpoenas to ten American tech companies, requiring them to produce communications with foreign governments, including the EU.

The congressional report accuses the EU of aggressively using its so-called Digital Services Act (DSA) to pressure tech companies to remove social media content that the EU considers “disinformation,” which in practice has meant posts critical of the ruling European establishment.

Meanwhile, companies that do not comply with EU regulations are threatened with huge penalties. We have seen what the EU is capable of. Last December, X was slapped by Brussels with a staggering €120 million fine.

Guess what topic was off limits in the European Parliament this week? Indeed, Europarl was denied a vote on whether to debate the findings of the House Committee’s report or not.

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee thinks that in every European election since the DSA took effect in 2023, the EU has tried to censor speech. The House Committee fears this happened in The Netherlands (twice), Ireland (twice), France, Romania, Slovakia and Moldova.

The latter is not even an EU member, but as it is a neighbour of the bloc, Brussels seems to feel entitled to “address disinformation risks” there as well. Given that post-Brexit Britain is an even more important neighbour of the EU, there is no reason to suppose that Brussels is not capable of refraining from meddling in its elections, too.

I think what went wrong is that Roosevelt, if anyone, wasn't being altruistic when he had the USA military enter WW2, and never made any kind of case that Europe should adopt principles similar to the USA's Constitution at the time. Who knows, chances are things could've been different, even in Israel, and sadly, in the near century since, Orwellian forces did everything they could to make it harder for even the USA to fight against what's going on now. We can only there's people who're willing to battle back against what Europarliament's doing now. But recalling that sad poll news from earlier, who knows if the USA public will be willing to perform altruistically on even a topic like this?

Syrian Muslims in Holland committed honor murder of daughter

Another honor murder occurred in the Netherlands, when a Muslim father and 2 sons murdered a daughter who dared to take up western style living:

Two brothers in the Netherlands are on trial for the alleged honor killing of their Syrian teenage sister, whom her family accused of living a Western lifestyle.

The two men are suspected of being involved in the murder of their sister, Ryan Al Najjar, who was drowned, the NL Times reported Thursday.

Twenty-three-year-old Mohamed and 25-year-old Muhanad are suspected of being involved in the murder along with their father, Khaled, who has been named the main suspect in the case. However, he allegedly fled to Syria after the killing, according to i24 News. The father will reportedly be tried in absentia. [...]

Prosecutors have recommended sentences of 25 years for the father and 20 years each for the brothers in the case, the i24 News article said, noting a verdict is expected in early January.

Ryan’s body was found in a lake in northern Netherlands. Her hands and feet were bound and an autopsy report said there was signs of strangulation and drowning. [...]

Islam has long been an issue in the Netherlands. In 2014, Breitbart News reported a Dutch right-wing member of parliament called for a purge of mosques.

“Dutch unity, identity and culture are being wrecked by immigration and incubation. We do not want Islam in the Netherlands,” Machiel de Graaf, a member of Dutch anti-immigration and anti-Islam Party for Freedom (PVV), stated at the time.

The Religion of Peace should definitely be purged from all of Europe and here in Israel too. In the meantime, it's sad that the satanic "father" may never be punished for his part in the crime, and the brothers may not receive the death sentence, which they deserve to receive for the abominable crime they committed against their sister.

UN delegate who committed rape denial served with lawsuit

Francesca Albanese, the UN delegate who denied the sexual violence committed by Hamas on October 7, 2023, has been given a lawsuit in South Africa:

At the conclusion of another speech attacking Israel, Francesca Albanese - the UN Special Rapporteur on the so-called "Occupied Palestinian Territories" - was confronted with legal documents enabling a lawsuit against her, following her denial of the sexual terror attacks carried out by Hamas terrorists on October 7.

The incident, which caused significant embarrassment for Albanese, was discussed in an interview with Attorney Hillel Neuer, Director of UN Watch, who has compiled extensive evidence regarding her conduct.

"She is a very dangerous woman - not only to Israel but to the world," said Neuer. "Her UN mandate, established in 1993, is to investigate only Israel’s alleged violations. When Hamas, Islamic Jihad, or the Palestinian Authority commit atrocities, they are ignored - only Israel is targeted."

Neuer explained that Albanese was appointed in 2022 precisely because of her record of anti-Israel activism. "She’s not a lawyer but a jurist. She worked for two years at UNRWA - an agency taken over by Hamas in Gaza - where she engaged in anti-Israel propaganda. Later, she wrote several books attacking Israel. In 2014 she posted that the US government is controlled by the ‘Jewish lobby,’ a blatantly antisemitic statement reminiscent of the 1930s."

According to Neuer, UN Watch exposed videos of Albanese accusing Israel of genocide even before her appointment. "The UN knew exactly what it was getting - and she continues to accuse Israel of genocide and fabricated crimes," he said.

"Someone in her position should act as a serious academic investigator, following an ethical code. Instead, every Hamas falsehood is spread by her on social media as if it were an official UN statement. On October 7, her first response on Twitter was that Hamas’ actions shouldn’t be condemned, claiming they were a ‘reaction’ to Israeli oppression."

"Since then, she has denied the rapes and other atrocities committed by Hamas. In effect, she serves as Hamas’s spokesperson at the UN," said Neuer. He noted that Albanese continues to lecture at leading US universities, invited by their administrations. Her conduct has drawn condemnation from Germany, Canada, and France, though, as Neuer put it, "In today’s climate it’s difficult to stop the flood of antisemitism, often disguised as anti-Zionism."

Neuer revealed that Albanese was due to present a special report to the UN but is barred from entering the United States following a UN Watch campaign urging sanctions. Senator Marco Rubio announced measures including a travel ban, financial restrictions, and credit limitations.

The latest incident occurred in South Africa, where Albanese addressed a Nelson Mandela Foundation conference. Two months earlier, the group Christians and Jews United for Israel filed a lawsuit against her in a federal court in Colorado, after she published a report accusing Israel of genocide and listing companies tied to Israel as accomplices. The group claimed the report defamed them by portraying them as war criminals.

Neuer said that Albanese’s legal immunity expired at the end of her initial three-year term. “UN rules allow an automatic extension unless complaints are filed. In her case, we submitted several, including one from Israel’s ambassador in Geneva and objections from Argentina, the US, and the Netherlands.”

He added that the UN official handling the issue referred the complaints to a sympathetic internal committee. “The Colorado court has not yet heard the case but has already ruled that Albanese no longer enjoys immunity - which allowed the lawsuit to proceed.”

“At the South Africa conference,” Neuer recounted, “as she stepped off the stage, a local legal representative tried to hand her the lawsuit papers, as required under US law. Her bodyguards tried to block it, and it remains unclear whether the documents reached her. Still, South African media reported the story prominently, calling it ‘a major embarrassment’ for the guest speaker at the Nelson Mandela conference.”

It remains to be seen whether Francesca Albanese has officially received the court documents, or if the plaintiffs will need another opportunity to serve them personally.

As reported here, a Christian movement is among the plaintiffs, since Albanese attacked them for their support for Israel:

As Breitbart News has reported, the groups, Christian Friends of Israeli Communities and Christians for Israel USA, are suing Albanese for defamation for accusing them of complicity in so-called “genocide.”

Albanese is a radically pro-Palestinian and antisemitic UN official who is subject to U.S. sanctions. The Nelson Mandela Foundation came in for criticism for hosting an official whose mission is in conflict to Mandela’s message of reconciliation.

Nevertheless, the Foundation’s event drew a large audience, which was celebrated as a triumph — until lawyers for the American Christian groups showed up with papers ordering her to defend a U.S. civil suit.

The South African government had, in fact, given permission for the American lawyers to serve Albanese with court papers, though it later apologized and said that the permission had been granted in error.

It's actually miraculous they made it possible to serve the papers, considering the downhill trajectory the country's taken under their presidential incumbent Cyril Ramaphosa. Hopefully, this'll damage Albanese's undeserved career, and hopefully, she'll have to pay compensation to the plaintiffs.

Muslim "asylum seeker" in Holland murdered teenage girl

Dutch patriot Geert Wilders has spoken out in rightful anger after a teenage girl was murdered by an Islamofascist in Holland:

Dutch populist leader Geert Wilders has called for a complete shut down of allowing asylum seekers into the Netherlands in the wake of the killing of a 17-year-old girl in Amsterdam allegedly at the hands of an asylum seeker.

Last week, the Netherlands was horrified by the brutal death of 17-year-old Lisa, who was stabbed to death while returning to her Amsterdam apartment following a night out with friends.

On Friday, it was revealed that the 22-year-old suspect in the alleged murder was in the country as an asylum seeker. He is also suspected in two other incidents, including a violent sexual attack on another woman on August 14th and an attempted sexual assault on August 10th, according to Dutch daily De Telegraaf.

Following the disclosure of the suspect being an asylum seeker on Friday, Party for Freedom (PVV) leader Geert Wilders called for an immediate and “complete asylum ban” in the Netherlands.

The call was reiterated in the PVV’s manifesto for the upcoming general election in October released on Saturday. In a forward to the programme, Wilders said that “the Netherlands is full, overcrowded, absolutely overflowing.”

“The PVV is standing up for democratic resistance. Against asylum centers, against mass immigration and Islamization, against nuisance and crime—and against the decades-long left-liberal policies that have caused the deplorable state of our country,” Wilders wrote.

“We are completely done with it. Done with disruptive asylum seekers, done with criminal non-Western immigrants, done with foreigners profiting from our welfare state—and done with the constant obstruction from politicians too cowardly to stand up for the Dutch. The PVV is putting the Dutch first.”

It's an utter outrage yet another innocent and defenseless girl had to fall victim to a repulsive crime, all because somebody out there believes foreigners with poor ideologies are somehow far more important than decent locals.

Geert Wilders is right that danger continues to grow

Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who's long been in danger of Islamofascism, has written about why he hopes European voters will make the right choice in coming elections:

Last week, upon arrival in Scotland, Donald Trump warned the Europeans that if they do not stop mass immigration, it will be the end of them.

“This immigration is killing Europe,” he said. When I met the American President in The Hague five weeks ago, he had told me the same. The President personally encouraged me to continue my fight for the safety and survival of the Dutch people. Donald Trump is putting America first and many Europeans do not like that, but at least he cares about ordinary Europeans, realizing how uncontrolled mass immigration is putting them in danger.

Europe needs to act if it wants to avoid becoming a Northern appendage of Africa or the Western edge of the Islamic Ummah. And it needs to act NOW! I am the leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), by far the largest party in the Netherlands. The PVV was also the leading party in the Dutch government coalition until we brought that coalition down in June. We brought it down because our three centrist coalition partners refused to accept our plans to put an immediate stop to the influx of so-called refugees and asylum seekers.

The Dutch are by nature a welcoming people. However, fake refugees who want to enter the Netherlands from our neighbouring countries Germany and Belgium – both countries where they could have asked asylum – should not be allowed to enter and send away immediately. They are not asylum seekers but illegal migrants.

We joined the government because we wanted the Dutch borders closed: the Netherlands need an asylum stop right now. Unfortunately, the constant obstruction by centrist and leftish-liberal politicians, unelected civil servants and activist judges made it impossible for us to make much progress, while time is rapidly running out.

Hence, I felt it was my duty to force elections on the topic of immigration. This October’s Dutch general election will truly be a “Flight 93 election” for the Netherlands. The metaphor, borrowed from Trump advisor Michael Anton, refers to the plane that was headed for the U.S. Capitol on 9/11 when brave passengers seized control and crashed it into a field rather than on the American capital. The passengers were faced with the choice: either to do nothing and die, or charge the cockpit.

This also applies to other European countries, including Britain, in their next general elections. Voters must choose: Either give patriotic parties the mandate to effectively close the borders or squander their future and that of their children.

This is correct, though either way, the day is sadly coming when even USA conservatives will have to make a challenging decision about whether to join the battle in WW3, since, if nobody's willing to defend civilized people from barbarism, how can we expect to defend the USA and Israel convincingly? Thankfully, Trump's demonstrated that he does care about innocent European citizens, and he's demanded the Canadian premier, Mark Carney, stop his plans to recognize a "palestinian state". It can also be said Trump's now making similar demands from France and Britain. And, he's even imposed special sanctions on the PLO, for the right reasons. We must hope his current efforts will bear fruit, and that Wilders will be able to succeed with his own missions too.

Geert Wilders received death threats

Dutch politician Wilders, whose life has been in danger from Islamofascists for years, told on social media that he's received more death threats recently:

“You will die, Geert Wilders” is just one of the threats received by the Dutch opposition politician, a long-standing Israel-ally.

Wilders posted on his X a list of threats, such as “A bullet. Wilders, like Jews, is vermin that must be exterminated,” “Zionist dogs like you will be shot,” and “We will cut your head soon.”

“One day, your head will be cut off and hanged in the famous square of Pakistan. Be patient, they will reach you very soon” read another.

Wilders told the Jerusalem Post that he had conveyed the threats to the police, but with "all the threats, hundreds of times a year, sometimes they can find the sender and prosecute, but most of the times they can’t or the authorities of the country of the sender will not cooperate with the Dutch authorities."

He added that last year, two Pakistanis, one of whom is imam, were sentenced to prison by a Dutch court for issuing a Fatwa to kill Wilders, the Post.

The trial happened in absentia because Pakistani authorities would not cooperate.

Experience with hate

Wilders previously told the Post that he experienced the hatred that some people in the Middle East held for Israel when traveling in countries like Egypt when he was a young man.

He said it was tragic how when Israel was mentioned, people he had cordial interactions with became incensed.

It's very sad how Wilders remains a target of a barbaric ideology, and one of the worst parts being that the "authorities" in sharia-controlled countries won't do anything to curb this behavior.

How Europe failed in its promise to prevent evil ideologies from resurrecting

The Jerusalem Post interviewed Fiamma Nirenstein, who explained the origins of Europe's failures to prevent antisemitism, among other forms of bigotry, from reviving again after WW2:

In conversation with the Post, she recounted a recent press trip to the Gaza border, where she met an IDF soldier whose grandfather was in Auschwitz, whose father fought in the Yom Kippur War, and who himself was now about to fight in Gaza.

"I am never again," the soldier told her.

Israel is the one actively fighting a "system of hate which wishes to destroy civilization and culture," Nirenstein said, making her realize that Jews and Israel "are the only ones with the right to say 'never again,' and mean it"

In Europe, in the countries supposed to be the very guardians of these values, "There has been a true failure of the 'never again' promise," she added. One only needs to look at the crowds chanting for an end to democracy, for death to the Jews, for the destruction of Israel from the river to the sea, to see this failure, Nirenstein said.

She stressed that this happened much before the large wave of immigration from Islamic nations to Europe, bringing with it an anti-Western ideology.

The story of the denial of 'never again' began in the USSR, Nirenstein told the Post, which, with its harsh criticism of imperialism and capitalism, generated a self-hate in the West.

"This then became an instrument of power," she added.

"The way the communist building enriched itself was through the establishment of the UN" which she said became the basis of much of the West's self-implosion.

On November 10, 1975, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 3379, declaring Zionism "a form of racism and racial discrimination.”

The UN, as the seeming instrument of democracy, sought to label the Jewish democracy as a racist, colonialist, and imperialist force.

As a result of this, Nirenstein explained, the oppressors were labeled as the oppressed, and the oppressed as the oppressors.

"On Thursday night we saw the aggression of young Muslims in Amsterdam [against Israelis], and the next day, blond youths wearing Keffiyehs were the ones protesting."

"These are the children of the West who think of themselves as the imperialist, racist, oppressors," Nirenstein said. As a way of absolving themselves of guilt, the self-hating Westerners commit a sort of "suicide."

Allying themselves with who they believe to be the oppressed and identifying themselves as the oppressors allows those in the West to feel they have atoned, she said.

"It is the same phenomenon we see in universities, by which Shakespeare is cancelled, Churchill is cancelled, the founders of America: cancelled," Nirenstein adds.

"Here is a huge movement of self-destruction of the West, and in the middle is antisemitism."

This has significant impacts for Israel, which "suffers a strategic blow from this situation," Nirenstein added.

With the hiding of modern antisemitism behind the guise of anti-Zionism, Israel has become demonized and delegitimized.

One of the worst things about the modern indoctrination is that it was doubtlessly planned for decades. And now, it'll be very hard to mend that damage for ages to come.

Now Dutch police do something

After the terrible incident last week in Amsterdam where an antisemitic attack occurred at a sport stadium, now the Dutch police have taken action against more anti-Israel rioters:

Dutch police arrested dozens of anti-Israel demonstrators on Sunday, after they defied a temporary ban on protests, imposed after mass violence against Israeli tourists following a Thursday night soccer game in Amsterdam.

Hundreds of demonstrators had gathered in the capital city’s Dam Square, in defiance of the ban. There, protesters denounced the Israelis who attended the soccer game, in which Maccabi Tel Aviv faced off against local Ajax.

After the ban’s extension was ratified on Sunday, police moved in to break up the protest, instructing protesters to leave and rounding up more than 100 of them, according to a Reuters journalist.

They were put on buses and dropped off on the outskirts of the city, police spokesperson Ramona van den Ochtend said, without confirming how many had been picked up.

Even that's not enough. What they too are doing is abominable, and they should be jailed for their offenses. And Geert Wilders and his premier will have a lot of work to do if they want to ensure this cannot continue.

Antisemitic pogrom attack in Holland

An abomimable act of assault on Israelis by Islamofascists at a soccer stadium in the Netherlands occurred, and local authorities appeared unwilling to prevent it:

Dutch populist leader Geert Wilders has condemned what appeared to be an organized, widespread targeted attack by anti-Israel rioters in Amsterdam on Thursday night, branding it a “pogrom” on the streets of the capital.

As Breitbart News reported, Dutch security forces appeared unable to protect the tourists as they were ambushed by roaming gangs of masked attackers who shouted “Free Palestine” as they hunted, beat and brutally harassed the Israelis.

[...] The Times of Israel reports ten Israelis were hospitalized and three were out of contact with their families following the hours of overnight violence.

The outlet observed the attack “apparently perpetrated largely by local Muslims and Arabs, with hundreds more people reportedly besieged in their hotels and fearing they could be attacked again when trying to reach their flights home.”

Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof denounced the “unacceptable antisemitic attacks on Israelis.”

He added he had spoken with his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to assure him that “the perpetrators will be tracked down and prosecuted.”

Here's more information:

King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands expressed “deep horror and shock” over the attack on several Jews in Amsterdam Thursday night following a soccer game where Maccabi Tel Aviv played.

“We failed the Jewish community of the Netherlands during World War II, and last night we failed again,” Willem-Alexander said to Israeli President Isaac Herzog.

Willem-Alexander added that the Dutch government would ensure the safety of Jews and Israelis visiting the country and facilitate their safe return to Israel.

Herzog told the king that the attacks “echoed dark and grim times for Jewish people and must be equivocally condemned.”

According to victims of the attacks, organized gangs of Arab and Muslim rioters waited for Jews who were leaving the soccer game and attacked them in the street. Social media videos show attackers hunting, beating, and injuring Israelis while shouting “Free Palestine” and curses in Arabic.

It turns out Dutch police were not willing to do their job:

Last night's antisemitic pogrom in Amsterdam came a little over a month after Nieuw Israëlisch Weekblad reported that the Dutch police were allowing officers to refuse to protect Jewish institutions in Holland.

Police spokeswoman Mireille Beentjes told De Telegraaf that she was aware of officers voicing "moral objections" to being deployed to protect Jewish institutions and that the police force had no "strict policies" forcing officers to protect such sites.

“We take moral objections into account when creating schedules. But if there’s an urgent task, you will be deployed, whether you want to or not," she said. “You are expected to behave professionally. Others shouldn’t notice anything.”

Among the sites some officers refused to be stationed near is the Dutch National Holocaust Museum in Amsterdam.

This practically confirms where the officials involved actually stand even when it comes to their own local history. It's obscene, just like the assaults themselves, and all police officials guilty of racist dereliction of duty for the sake of the Religion of Peace cannot remain in their jobs.

There have been some suspects arrested, although:

Chief Public Prosecutor of the Amsterdam Public Prosecutor's Office Rene de Beukelaer said during a press conference on Friday that of the 62 suspects arrested after the violent attacks on Israelis in the city, only 10 are still in custody.

The Chief Prosecutor says he aims to try the ten suspects soon during a fast-track hearing.

According to Dutch news outlet Trouw, de Beukelaer said that the suspects are in custody for "public violence against individuals and groups." The suspects who were released are suspected of insulting and throwing fireworks.

Police say they have footage of the suspects and are also calling on people to share footage with the police.

"The investigation that we started during the night focuses on suspects who can be seen on the film footage," De Beukelaer said. "We are also investigating whether there are connections between these suspects, and how they came to these violent actions. We are also investigating whether it was organized," the chief prosecutor said.

It's not good to release those whom they did. If they shot fireworks, which are dangerous, that's bad too. Not to mention that monsters like those cannot be allowed to occupy the space around a stadium.

Sacha Roytman-Dracha says it's a new variation on Kristallnacht:

In November 1938, the world witnessed the beginning of the Holocaust with Kristallnacht, a horrific pogrom of extreme violence against Jews. Last night, 86 years after that horrific event, Amsterdam experienced another pogrom that felt like history repeating itself.

The shocking scenes from Amsterdam – a coordinated and planned attack against Israeli soccer fans – should not only send shockwaves through Europe but serve as a painful reminder of Europe's and the world's long, unresolved struggle with rising antisemitism.

The brutal attack, led by Islamic extremists targeting Jewish people in the streets, differs in many ways from Kristallnacht. Today, Jews have a strong state of their own, there are authorities to manage such incidents, and the scale of violence is different. We no longer need to wait for the world to act and rescue us – we can and do act ourselves.

Still, the horrifying situation faced by fans who simply wanted to watch a soccer match drew chilling parallels to Kristallnacht, proving that we are witnessing the ideological heirs of the Nazis today – Islamic extremists operating with similar hatred and violence, seeking to spill Jewish blood.

"I hear the approaching thunder that, one day, will destroy us too," Anne Frank wrote weeks before she was discovered in hiding with her family. What we witnessed in Amsterdam was not random; it was part of a larger, premeditated campaign of intimidation and hatred directed at Jews, and represents the peak of global antisemitism since Oct. 7, 2023.

The world must understand: that Jews have lost their sense of personal security. Throughout history, there have been many instances where Jews were forced to leave countries where they felt less secure, and now they are asking themselves the same question: how safe are we in Europe? If law enforcement authorities do not proactively tackle antisemitism, violence, and terrorism with a firm hand, Jews will leave and return to Israel, leaving Europe to face alone the extremism that is reaching new heights and will no longer target only Jews. [...]

To prevent another catastrophe, Europe must confront reality and acknowledge that it has become a haven for extremist ideologies seeking to destroy Jewish life, as well as core aspects of European life. This is not a problem that can be minimized or ignored. The rise of violent antisemitism is not just a Jewish issue; it's a European issue, threatening the foundations of European freedom, democracy, and civil rights.

The time to act is now. Europe must begin taking concrete steps to ensure the safety of its Jewish citizens by addressing sources of radicalization, cracking down on violent hate groups, and ending tolerance for antisemitism in any form.

Another reason why European countries must clamp down on and exile these Islamic offenders is because they prey on innocent women and children too.

Update: Wilders rightly says the jihadists who committed the crime must be deported.

Update 2: Wilders has confirmed that in actuality, no one involved in the assault was arrested:

Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch Party for Freedom, claimed on Saturday night that, contrary to the claims of the Dutch authorities, no arrests had been made of people who took part in the pogrom against Israelis in Amsterdam on Thursday night.

“I am speechless. Amsterdam Police just confirmed that NO ONE has been arrested during the Islamic Jewhunt in Amsterdam Thursday night. All arrests have been made before and during the soccer match and NOT during the pogrom,” Wilders wrote in a post on X.

Well this is serious. No police officials who refused in any way to take action against the aggressors can remain in their jobs or receive payment after what they enabled.

Update 3: the New York Times has been panned for downplaying the seriousness of the issue.

With Geert Wilders at the helm, the Netherlands now prosecutes an Islamic imam for issuing a fatwa

Geert Wilders has written on Breitbart about how the Dutch prosecution service is now prosecuting a Muslim imam for issuing a fatwa that threatens innocent lives:

Today, September 2nd, is a historic day. It is the first time ever that an Islamic cleric will have to stand trial for issuing an assassination fatwa.

In a few weeks, it will be 20 years since policemen wearing bulletproof vests and carrying machine guns arrived at my home. They gave me ten minutes to pack, pushed me into an armoured car and drove me off to an unknown destination. The evening of November 4, 2004, was the last time that my wife and I were in our house. Since that moment, we have been forced to live in various safe houses. We have lost our freedom and privacy. Everywhere I go, I am constantly surrounded by bodyguards.

The same thing happened on that ominous evening to my colleague, fellow member of the Dutch Parliament, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a fugitive from Islamic Somalia. We had both been fierce critics of Islam and the Islamization of our country, the Netherlands. As a result of this, Islamic death threats or fatwas ordering the Islamic faithful to kill us had been issued. [...]

Today, in Amsterdam, the court case begins against two Pakistani citizens, Muhammed Ashraf Asif Jalali (55) and Saad Hussain Rizvi (29). Although the proceedings will be held in their absence, the trial is hugely significant. Not just for me, the victim, but also for the defence of the freedom of speech of every Dutchman and citizen of the free West.

I hope this means the culprits are in custody/prison, and thus being tried in absentia. Because they cannot be allowed to roam the streets free, something that's tragically become the norm even in the USA in some cases. And let's hope the offender is actually convicted, because the time's come to start sending messages, and also to start pushing the Religion of Peace out of Europe and even Israel and Lebanon. Wilders has come a long way in surviving the dangers, and will hopefully be able to deal with this case as best as possible.

Geert Wilders now premier of the Netherlands

Finally, Dutch populist Geert Wilders has been able to form a government, and become prime minister of Holland:

The Netherlands will finally get the right wing government its people voted for, and some of the toughest border control in the Western World after veteran populist and Islam sceptic Geert Wilders got the agreement of coalition partners to form a cabinet.

Geert Wilders, who has lived under strict round-the-clock police protection since 2004 over threats to his life by Islamists hailed the success of months-long negotiations between four right wing parties in the Netherlands to form a new government. “The sun will shine again in the Netherlands… The Netherlands will be ours again” he said in celebration of the development. The documents were presented to the Dutch King on Thursday afternoon.

After all the horrible experiences Wilders has been through in over 2 decades, he absolutely deserves this job, and let's hope he proves capable working in it. Europe very badly needs politicians who can turn around a bad situation that Islam's caused, and which led to the murder of Theo Van Gogh in the early 2000s.

The sojourn of a Turkish convert to Judaism

Here's the story of artist Lea Gul, a Turkish woman who converted to Judaism, and what's great about this news is that it looks like she's not the kind of convert who follows the kind of dress code the ultra-Orthodox go by:

Painter Lea Gul’s first solo exhibition in Israel – opening the evening of May 15 at the ZOA House in Tel Aviv – marks a new chapter in the fascinating life story of a religious Jewish Jerusalemite raised as a secular Muslim in Istanbul.

A mother of four who looks like a fashion model even though she just turned 51, Lea overcame many obstacles to get where she is today.

Though many students in her Istanbul high school were Jewish, she says, and all her boyfriends were Jewish, her pull to Judaism was precipitated by nearly dying in a car crash in 2000.

“I should have died, and I started wondering why I didn’t,” she says.

That question led her on a spiritual search, and in 2002 she told her parents that she wanted to move to India.

Her mother suggested that first she should read three holy books “to see if I could find the source of the power that protected me from death.”

Converting to Judaism

She was very taken by the Torah’s philosophy and started to research Judaism. Two years later, while visiting Anne Frank’s house in Amsterdam, she made her decision to convert. “That’s what I wrote in the guest book on the way out,” she recalls.

At home in Istanbul, she had two passions: competitive horseback riding and painting. She had a painting studio where she taught adults and children, and hosted evening discussions with art historians and philosophers. She had four solo and two group exhibitions between 1999 and 2005.

Gradually, her mother took over the classes so that Lea (then named Konca, Turkish for “rosebud”) could delve into Jewish learning. Her mother was fully supportive, happy that her daughter had found something to believe in.

But she couldn’t convert in Turkey because Ottoman law forbids Jews from converting Muslims. In 2005, she decided to live in the Amsterdam Jewish community and convert there, but first she had an exhibition of her horse paintings.

Her family may have been "secular" and only Moslem by default, but the rest of Turkey is run by sharia that clearly does pose a threat to ladies like her, so it's lucky she was able to travel elsewhere, if that's what it took to ensure she could convert. That said, Turkey should not have to continue being run by Islam, and someday, all land stolen from Greece must be returned, including the Hagia Sophia cathedral that Recep Erdogan's regime is converting to a mosque.

HER FATHER passed away in 2019 and her mother in March 2021. Needing to support herself, she put her full energy into painting, a passion she had returned to in 2015, using a style she learned from surrealist Turkish painter Erol Denec, a protégé of Austrian painter Ernst Fuchs, co-founder of the Vienna School of Fantastic Realism.

“I felt if Hashem gave me this talent, I should use it,” she says.

“My work now is an unlimited way of seeing beyond reality. With Torah, I was able to express what is inside of me.”

One day, a real estate agent who had come to show Lea’s apartment to a prospective client saw Lea’s paintings and told her friend Vered Daya, from the ZOA Gallery, about Lea’s talent.

Veteran art world publicist Michal Sadan, a former curator, was brought in to help make arrangements for a show. Excited about Lea’s potential, Sadan engaged Galit Zimbalist to curate the ZOA exhibition, which runs through the end of June.

“I know that she will find her standing in the Israeli world of art because her work has powerful energy, her paintings are fascinating, and the spectators are deeply moved,” Zimbalist writes in her text for the “Unmasked before the Forces of Creation” show.

“Lea paints her pure emotions, using an intense multicolored palette, layers of color, and the precision of the boundaries that create the sense of virtual reality in the story.

This is something I'm impressed to read, that the lady's talents in art are being recognized, and religion shouldn't have to stand in the way. Nor should there be any fuss about dress codes and such when it comes to how a religious woman runs her life. Something we should hope more ultra-Orthodox will come to recognize as well.

Former Dutch premier who supported antisemitism and Hamas dies of euthanasia

Dries van Agt, one of the worst antisemitic politicians in the Netherlands, and his wife, have both died by ways of euthanasia:

Dries Van Agt, who served as prime minister of the Netherlands from 1977 to 1982, and whom Dutch watchdog groups condemned in recent years as an antisemite, chose to die last Monday with the assistance of a doctor, along with his wife. He was 93.

The double-euthanasia was announced on Sunday, by Van Agt’s organization Rights Forum, which he founded to oppose what the group calls “blind support for Israel” in the Netherlands’ public and political discourse.

[...] Van Agt made the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a major area of interest later in his life and was condemned on several occasions by Jewish and other organizations as an antisemite. Van Agt defended Hamas as well as individual terrorists several times.

In 2008, the former prime minister spoke at a rally featuring a televised address by a Hamas official. As a justice minister in the 1970s, Van Agt cited his "Aryan" roots in explaining his plan to pardon four Nazi war criminals due to health reasons.

In 2022, the former prime minister said that settlers in the West Bank had poisoned a three-year-old Palestinian girl, a charge that B'Tselem, the leading Israeli organization devoted to documenting alleged human rights violations, said it was not aware of. CIDI, the Netherlands' main antisemitism watchdog, called the accusation a blood libel. The Central Jewish Board of the Netherlands declared Van Agt an antisemite in 2017.

The Rights Forum, which Van Agt founded in 2009, lobbies Dutch politicians and representatives to challenge Israeli policy in the UN and International Criminal Court, alleging “violations of international law and human rights in Israel and Palestine,” and naming international law and human rights as its “explicit and consistent reference framework” as an organization. The group accuses Israel of “violat[ing] the fundamental rights of millions of Palestinians in often extremely violent ways, generation after generation.”

The organization has come under criticism from pro-Israel groups such as NGO Monitor, in particular for a pattern of rejecting allegations or definitions of antisemitism that the group deems politicized: in 2023, the group accused the Dutch ambassador to Israel of “going too far” when he called a shooting attack, in which a 21-year-old resident of East Jerusalem killed seven people and wounded two more, antisemitic.

Gee, if this man was going to go out of his way to condone blood libels and support terrorists, it's hard to feel sorry he decided to end his life as he did. But, he's made sure to leave behind a venomous legacy and movement that's carrying on his repulsive practices, and they're sure to cause only so much more damage for years to come.

2 very fortunate elections in south America and Europe

Some good news comes from Argentina, where a more conservative-leaning politician, Javier Milei, has been elected president, and, he'll even move the Argentinian embassy to Jerusalem:

Argentina’s libertarian President-elect Javier Milei confirmed on Monday that he would make visits to both Israel and the United States before his inauguration on December 10, trips he described as “spiritual” and intended to meet with rabbis whom he had consulted during the election.

Milei won the presidency in a landslide on Sunday night, defeating the current Minister of Economics Sergio Massa, a socialist. Massa’s tenure has been defined by inflation of upwards of 140 percent, skyrocketing poverty and joblessness levels, and the worst economic crisis in the nation’s history. Milei, a self-described libertarian, has promised to install the U.S. dollar as an official currency, dramatically cut government spending through the elimination or privatization of agencies, and eliminate the Argentine Central Bank.

On foreign policy, Milei promised to abandon the pro-Iran, pro-China policies of incumbent President Alberto Fernández and the long line of socialist Peronists who preceded him and has repeatedly stated that Argentina’s top allies under his administration will be Israel and the United States. Milei reportedly began studying the Torah and considered converting to Judaism from Catholicism in 2021, and has maintained regular studies with multiple rabbis.

Indeed, what makes this a most interesting election is that Milei's met with some Judaist representatives, and as noted, considered conversion too. And, what if he does? I just hope it's not the ultra-Orthodox edition he considers, honestly. But, if he's willing to convert, that could signify a very positive direction in the future for the Latin world.

In the second round of good news, Geert Wilders' political party has won the most seats at the Dutch parliament:

A wave of anti-mass migration sentiment across Europe has seen staunch Islam critic Geert Wilders pull a massive upset in the Netherlands, as exit polls from research agency Ipsos predict that his Party for Freedom (PVV) will become the largest party in the House of Representatives with an estimated 35 seats, public broadcaster NOS reports.

Performing in a way that many would have considered unthinkable just a week ago, the populist party is now projected to have more than doubled its representation over the previous election in 2021 when the PVV only managed to secure 17 seats in the House.

The PVV was followed by the leftist-green coalition GL-PvdA of Great Reset proponent Frans Timmermans at 26 seats, the centre-right People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) at 23 seats, and the centrist New Social Contract (NSC) at 20.

The exit polls then projected the socially liberal Democrats 66 as having picked up 10 seats, falling from 24 in the previous election and seven seats for the upstart Farmer Citizen Movement (BBB) after previously only holding one seat in the chamber.

Hailing the apparent victory, Geert Wilders shared a video on social media of himself celebrating the results while proclaiming that his party was now the strongest force in the country.

Finally, Wilders for one seems to have achieved a position he's qualified for, though it still remains to be seen if he'll follow through convincingly on fighting against Islamofascism in the Netherlands, and elsewhere around Europe. For now, this does send a vital message what the European public thinks about Islam invading the continent.

EU must prove they can get Muslim countries to take back their nationals

So far though, this hasn't been the case:

EU interior ministers met in Stockholm last Thursday [Jan. 26] discuss ways to increase the number of returns of irregular migrants to their countries of origin, including by further restricting the issuance of visas to nationals of “non-cooperative” countries.

"It is clear that in an area without internal borders, we need a Europe-wide policy to deal with asylum and migration issues,” said Belgium’s State Secretary for Asylum and Migration Nicole de Moor (CD&V) before the meeting.

The relevant ministers from national governments met for the first day of informal ministerial talks under the new Swedish EU presidency, which focused on asylum, migration, and home affairs.

For de Moor, it is a question of having “stronger borders, more solidarity between the member states, and a better European return policy, because the subject of return is crucial.

“We need to speak with one voice when addressing nationals of third countries who do not cooperate sufficiently with our return policy,” she insisted.

“We have a very low return rate”

“We see irregular arrivals increasing (…) Returning those who are denied asylum in Europe is a very important issue,” added Swedish Migration Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard.

Of the approximately 340,500 “return” decisions issued across Europe in 2021, just 21 percent were actually implemented, according to Eurostat [...]

Hugh Fitzgerald addressed the issue:

These are not asylum seekers, but economic migrants. Their “movements within the Union” are prompted by the desire to move to the richer countries where welfare benefits are the most generous. Thus, for example, migrants who first land in Italy or Spain or the Balkans will try to move to such rich countries as Germany and Sweden, where a cornucopia of benefits are offered. One way to end this moving about Europe by economic migrants, in order to maximize their benefits, is to pass an EU law requiring migrants to remain in whatever country they first land in for a certain period – say, ten years – no matter how slim the benefits may be.

At least the EU has become sufficiently alarmed about the problem to hold a special meeting to discuss how best to persuade countries of origin to take back those of their citizens whom the countries of the EU wish to expel. That is one sign of sanity breaking out in Europe, after nearly two decades of immigration madness, in which tens of millions of Muslim migrants have either been allowed to enter the EU, or been born to Muslims who had previously been allowed in. Now the civilizational threat posed by so many Muslims, that such intrepid souls as Geert Wilders, Eric Zemmour, and Laurent Obertone, have written about, is beginning to be more widely understood. It is no longer forbidden to discuss this threat. And what has become obvious to many people who for too long had been simply silenced by fear of being tarred as “Islamophobic” needs to be endlessly repeated. It’s one sentence that everyone in the West should fully grasp and memorize: “The large-scale presence of Muslims in Europe has created a situation that is far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous for the indigenous Europeans and for other, non-Muslim, migrants, than would be the case without that large-scale Muslim presence.” Don’t leave home without it.

If you ask me, it should be a badge of honor to be called "Islamophobic" (and also "transphobic", if it matters). The election of figures like Giorgia Meloni in Italy is also a hopeful sign, and they, in example, will hopefully ensure that sanity is eventually restored, and especially safety.

ICC is told off by Israel, for good reason

The government responded to the Intl. Criminal Court's latest attempt to prosecute IDF soldiers for daring to defend their country:

Israel will not cooperate with the International Criminal Court’s investigation of Israel for alleged war crimes, top ministers decided on Thursday.

The state will argue in a letter of response to The Hague that the court has no jurisdiction to open the probe, consistent with Israel’s longstanding position.

The letter will also declare that Israel rejects the accusation that it committed war crimes.

Israel is not a member of the ICC, and has a policy of not cooperating with it, such that it was unclear that the government would respond at all to the letter Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda sent to last month.

[...] “While IDF soldiers fight with supreme morality against terrorists that commit war crimes daily, the court in The Hague decided to denounce Israel,” Netanyahu said in the discussion. “There is no other word for this than hypocrisy. A body established to fight for human rights turned into a hostile body that defends those who trample human rights.”

Just like the UN, even the ICC could use a defunding.

The mother of a teen girl murdered by a jihadist speaks out against the ICC

Here's a report about a mother who lost her daughter to an Islamofascist, and what she has to say about the Intl. Criminal Court wanting to put Israelis defending themselves on trial:

Rina Ariel, mother of Hallel Ariel, a 14-year-old who was murdered in her bed by a Palestinian terrorist, spoke out against the decision by the International Criminal Court to open a war crimes probe against Israel in a letter to the ICC on Sunday.

In January, 2020, the Shurat HaDin organization filed a lawsuit on behalf of Rina and her husband against the Palestinian Authority concerning the “pay for slay” payments received by the family of the terrorist and the incitement by the PA which supports those who kill Israeli civilians with up to NIS 12,000 per month.

To date, the Hague has not issued any response to the lawsuit, according to Shurat HaDin.

In a letter sent on behalf of the parents on Sunday, Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, president of Shurat HaDin, stressed that while the ICC does not have jurisdiction over Israel, as it is not a member state of the court, nor the PA, since it is not a state, it does have jurisdiction over PA President Mahmoud Abbas and most PA officials since they hold Jordanian citizenship and Jordan is a member state.

The letter questioned why repeated submissions of evidence concerning crimes committed by PA officials were not included in the planned investigation and there has been no indication that these crimes will be investigated.

Simple answer is antisemitism is just so heavily ingrained in the ICC's staff, they will remain solidly one-sided for as long as they're around. This is why such global entities are tragically useless, just like the UN.