Whose side is the NY Times taking anyway?
Little Green Footballs (via Ace of Spades HQ) finds a photographer for the NY Times, Joao Silva, in a very suspicious position - he took pics while a terrorist fired on US troops in Iraq (click here for the slideshow, if you're up to it).
There are many interesting questions to be raised here, including - was the photographer able to gain the trust of terrorists? But then if not, why didn't he do something to help the army deal with the bastard(s)? And shouldn't even press photogs be armed for self-defense? What next, will the NYT be sending press photogs to Europe to take pictures of gang rapists on a rampage yet not do anything to help the victims?
Silva's also been putting his pictures on display in this online compilation (via Michelle Malkin). Seeing that he's an "award-winning" photog, I'd say there may be grounds on which to revoke them, if the award ceremonies weren't already dominated by other moonbats.
Yes, this does raise important questions, including if the MSM and terrorists have any kind of a partnership with each other. Which would be one more reason to prosecute the NYT.
Until then, if you've got a subscription, do yourself a favor and cancel it. Do not register for full use of their website either. And don't visit their site either, if you can help it.
Update: here's Michelle's Vent on Hot Air.
Others on the subject include Protein Wisdom, Power Line, Real Clear Politics, Patterico, Moonbattery, The Bullwinkle Blog, Right Voices, Hennessey's View, The Anchoress, Infinite Monkeys, Guidons, Fullosseous Flap, Granite Grok, Conservative Cat, Texas Rainmaker, Wide Awake Cafe, Political Party Poop, Paxalles, Max Conservative, 7.62mm Justice, Deep Keel, Conservative Blog Therapy.
There are many interesting questions to be raised here, including - was the photographer able to gain the trust of terrorists? But then if not, why didn't he do something to help the army deal with the bastard(s)? And shouldn't even press photogs be armed for self-defense? What next, will the NYT be sending press photogs to Europe to take pictures of gang rapists on a rampage yet not do anything to help the victims?
Silva's also been putting his pictures on display in this online compilation (via Michelle Malkin). Seeing that he's an "award-winning" photog, I'd say there may be grounds on which to revoke them, if the award ceremonies weren't already dominated by other moonbats.
Yes, this does raise important questions, including if the MSM and terrorists have any kind of a partnership with each other. Which would be one more reason to prosecute the NYT.
Until then, if you've got a subscription, do yourself a favor and cancel it. Do not register for full use of their website either. And don't visit their site either, if you can help it.
Update: here's Michelle's Vent on Hot Air.
Others on the subject include Protein Wisdom, Power Line, Real Clear Politics, Patterico, Moonbattery, The Bullwinkle Blog, Right Voices, Hennessey's View, The Anchoress, Infinite Monkeys, Guidons, Fullosseous Flap, Granite Grok, Conservative Cat, Texas Rainmaker, Wide Awake Cafe, Political Party Poop, Paxalles, Max Conservative, 7.62mm Justice, Deep Keel, Conservative Blog Therapy.
Labels: Iraq, jihad, msm foulness, terrorism
| Permalink | 
