ISIS threatens Europe, especially France

While incompetant and disastrous leaders like Emmanuel Macron waste time on "palestinian state recognition", Islamic jihadists continue to threaten France and other parts of Europe:

ISIS reportedly called upon Muslims to use any means necessary to kill “Christians and Jews” in the United States and Europe, with a specific focus on France, in an edition of its Arabic-language magazine.

Although the so-called Islamic State has lost its physical Caliphate after it was defeated under the first Trump administration, ISIS radicals continue to advocate for their strict interpretation of the Islamic religion and seek to influence impressionable young Muslims in the West to commit acts of terror in its name.

In a copy of its al-Naba obtained by the Centre for the Analysis of Terrorism (CAT) and shared with the French paper of record Le Figaro, ISIS wrote: “O monotheistic Muslims… Hit Jews and Christians, their crowds and convoys, in the streets and on the roads of America and Europe, and especially in France. Do not spare them, attack them, kill them by all means: by car, with a knife, a gun or by causing a fire.”

“Know that every disbeliever you kill makes them suffer more than our strikes can do here… Hit them in solitary attacks like those we have seen before in Paris, Brussels and other places in the countries of the Crusader.”

Despite the overtures from France and other European nations to back Palestinian statehood, the radical Islamist group urged Muslims to reject such offers, arguing that they are merely intended to “disarm Muslims and neutralise their jihad”.

One of the reasons all this appeasement will never work is because of verses in the Koran like 47:4, which condone attacks on "infidels" no matter their ethnic/religious background. Now, France continues to be a canary in the coal mine, targeted virtually from within by these monsters.

Update: it's also worth noting that leaders of the UK and Canada are facing internal criticism for their reprehensible positions.

Update 2: Naftali Bennett, of all people, is warning that Britain and France risk empowering Muslims in their countries with the way they're going.

Update 3: Hugh Fitzgerald says Emmanuel Macron's becoming an immoral president.

Update 4: new polls indicate that over 70 percent of the French public oppose recognition of a "palestinian state" (Hat tip: Jihad Watch).

Daughter of Muslim who almost murdered her in Washington condemns him in court for his crime, and also her mother

The daughter of the Iraqi interloper Ihsan Ali lashed out at him in court for what he nearly did to her last year, when he tried to commit an honor murder by her school in Olympia, Washington:

A Washington state teenager lashed out at her parents in court in July, telling them they tried to kill her in an alleged “honor killing” last year, K5 News reported.

Fatima, 18, who asked to be identified only by her first name, was assaulted at Timberline High School in October after resisting efforts by her father, Ihsan Ali, to send her to Iraq for an arranged marriage, the outlet reported. Her mother, Zahraa Ali, was also convicted in the case.

“You’re a monster, and I can’t believe you’re my dad,” Fatima told him in court, according to the outlet. “How could you call yourself a father… you tried to kill me! My dad tried to kill me with his own hands.”

[...] “My mom saw me almost pass away right in front of her own eyes and didn’t help me at all, didn’t say if I was OK … didn’t even try to be there for me,” Fatima reportedly said in court.

Thurston County Judge Christine Schaller sentenced Ihsan Ali to 20 months in prison and Zahraa Ali to one year, the maximum terms allowed, according to K5 News.

Which is not enough, sadly, and the judge withheld evidence from the jury, which is wrong. The parents may be barred from seeing their daughter again for another decade, but she'll still need to vanish elsewhere, and the parents have to be deported based on their actions. We must hope the State Department and Marco Rubio will see the monsters get thrown out, though they deserve much worse for what they tried to do to the girl, and her boyfriend who bravely tried to defend her. And the mother should also be ashamed of herself for wearing a burka, which goes without saying. It's nothing more than a symbol of enslavement.

Muslim parents in Washington attempted honor murder of daughter, were acquitted on that charge

A Muslim couple from Iraq who moved to Washington state, no doubt part of Joe Biden's damage to the USA, were found not guilty by a local court of trying to commit an honor murder of their daughter for refusing an arranged marriage back in Iraq (via Breitbart):

A verdict has been reached in the trial of a Lacey father and mother accused in an attempted "honor killing" of their own teenage daughter.

A jury found 44-year-old Ihsan Ali not guilty of second-degree attempted murder and first-degree assault. However, Ali was found guilty of second-degree and fourth-degree assault, and unlawful imprisonment.

The backstory:

Ali was captured on video appearing to choke his 17-year-old daughter on the ground outside Timberline High School in October 2024. The assault happened after the teen ran away from home, claiming her parents planned to forcefully send her to Iraq to marry an older man.

Multiple witnesses of the attack described seeing the daughter's eyes roll back as her father placed her in a choke hold. The victim's 16-year-old boyfriend attempted to intervene and was allegedly punched by the father, with another bystander eventually able to get the daughter to break away, according to court documents.

The victim's mother, 40-year-old Zahraa Ali, was found guilty of violating a protective order, but not guilty of second-degree attempted murder, second-degree assault and second-degree burglary.

The mother was accused of attacking her daughter in a similar manner, and was also present during the attack. Court documents state the daughter previously reported abuse by both her father and mother prior to the incident.

The girl's lucky to be alive, and her boyfriend did the right thing to save her, as did all other students and adults at the scene. But it's disgusting and heinous that the court would reduce the charges, in another example of failure to comprehend Islam, and that doesn't bode well. This also makes clear what's gone wrong up in the northwestern USA. My condolences to the girl, who'll hopefully be able to remain afar now from the monster parents, who should be imprisoned and deported for their repulsive crime. And shame on the news station for predictably refusing to make clear they're Islamists.

Update: Catherine Salgado notes that some of the most vital info was withheld from the jury by the judge, who should be ashamed of herself, and disbarred from law practice.

Former Miss Iraq wants to be on Israel's side

In this interview with Sarah Idan, the former Miss Iraq, she tells about how she came to recognize Israel as the good side, and also what she knows about the darkness of Islam's indoctrinations:

Since the terrible morning of Black Saturday, the question "Where were you on October 7?" has become common among Israelis. But Idan also remembers exactly where she was and how she felt at those moments.

"I was at home when I received a phone call from my friend, Hillel (Silverman, niece of comedian Sarah Silverman), who called me from Israel. She was panicking and said to me, 'Sarah, oh my God, turn on the TV. I think we're under attack.' At first, I answered her indifferently, 'What's new? You're attacked every day.' But then I went on social media. Every video, every picture, caused me actual physical pain in my heart. I thought maybe something was wrong with my blood pressure. I couldn't watch anymore. I felt immense pressure in my head. The anger and sadness made me physically ill."

She channeled the emotions that welled up in her into what she does best: spreading the truth on social media. "I tried to share with the world what was happening and post content, mainly in Arabic, because Arab media was hiding what happened."

"They only showed videos of Hamas fighting IDF soldiers. They didn't show the young people massacred at Nova or the women who were raped, so I tried to show that to people. I wrote there, 'Look at the barbaric Hamas, see what they're doing.' And I was really shocked by their responses. They claimed it was a lie and denied it while it was happening."

Q: To this day they deny it – and not just in the Arab world, in the Western world too.

"I went to Cornell and Stanford universities. They had a tent there, and I wanted to understand what the hell was going on there, so I wore a hijab and went there. I pretended I was one of them and started talking to them in Arabic. It felt like their organization was a militia of ... you know, like the militias in Iraq. They have orders, and they follow orders. They're not regular students."

Q: Orders from whom?

"They're part of a larger organization, supported by entities like the Iranian regime, the Muslim Brotherhood, all of America's enemies. Who funds the universities? Qatar. That's why they allowed them to protest and set up tents on university grounds. If a university's board of directors gets its money directly from Qatar, aren't the protesters in the tents also getting their money from the same places?"

At some point during the war, Idan decided she had to visit Israel herself and see with her own eyes the horror that had occurred. This isn't the first time she's visited Israel, but the difference from her previous visits was enormous.

"The first time I came, people were carefree, especially in Tel Aviv. There was something in the atmosphere that reminded me of an island state. The second time it was just... the air was full of anxiety, sadness. The feeling was like when I was in Iraq during the war. It was really sad."

Absolutely, and what can one expect after such a graphic murder and sexual violence rampage? That aside, any university that accepts funding from sources like Qatar as they stand today cannot be supported in any way, and must be boycotted. Good that Iran found out what the pro-Hamas mobs at the universities are like, and the people involved must be stopped somehow. These enemy-funded movements are a severe danger.

Supposedly bringing democracy to Iraq only helped the extreme Muslims now living there

Daniel Greenfield discusses how certain left-led governments are bringing back totalitarian regimes, and along the way, it's told, eyebrow-raisingly enough:

The only thing free about any of this is that there are still elections and people are still allowed to vote in them. But democracy, as residents of North Korea’s Democratic People’s Republic of Korea could tell you if they had any free speech, isn’t actually freedom. Bringing democracy to Iraq just turned it into a totalitarian Islamic state run by the Shiite majority. In actual free countries, people have more political freedom than just casting a ballot once every few years.

In other words, we have a situation that isn't all that different from Afghanistan, where perverse Islamists were those allowed to run the government, until their fellow Islamists, the Taliban, were able to reconquer following the Biden administration's disastrous withdrawal. And it wouldn't be shocking if the Taliban's okay with sexual violence against both sexes, despite what may have been claimed before about their supposedly being against it. And since we're on the subject, much as I'd like to say Ronald Reagan was an admirable fellow, the following history points out that regrettably, the way he approached the issue of Soviet Russia did not apply to the Religion of Peace as well. As if we're actually supposed to make a choice between ideologies.

So long as lenience on the Religion of Peace continues, the terrible problems will never be solved.

Muslim honor murders in UK are up by over 60 percent

As the UK fails to do anything to expel the Islamofascists who're already putting on displays of antisemitism, another failure is how they deal with Islamic honor murders (via Pamela Geller):

Honor-based abuse cases in England rose by more than 60% in two years, with 2,594 cases in 2022 vs. 1,599 in 2020. The data derive from 26 of 39 constabularies, The Guardian reported on Sunday.

Honor-based crimes can include murder, forced marriage, rape (gang rape is used as punishment against women suspected of engaging in illicit relations), forced genital mutilation and other coercive acts.

Such crimes are common in many Muslim countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh. (1.6 million people, or 2.7%, of the United Kingdom’s population identify as Pakistani, and 94,434, or 1.1%, as Bangladeshi, according to the 2022 U.K. census.)

A 2013 global survey of the world’s Muslims by the Pew Research Center found that in only 14 out of 23 countries did Muslims reject the practice of honor killing. Support for it was highest in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt and Jordan.

The problem of honor-based crimes, or honor violence, has become a serious issue in Europe amid increased migration from regions where the practice is accepted.

Well those countries that continue to put up with practice of the Religion of Peace itself sure aren't improving the situation. For now, it's shameful how they continue to practically let down whole generations of women and girls who've fallen victim to such horrific practices, and what these European countries are enabling is practically what led to the Rotherham rape scandal as well.

Leftist Jews have responsibility to shoulder for the Hamas disaster

According to Andrea Widberg, leftist Jews have reaped what they sowed by embracing the whole Arab/Islamic-state-of-Palestine propaganda angle:

“For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.” Hosea 8:7.

If it weren’t so unutterably tragic, it would be amusing to watch leftist Jews shout their outrage at fellow leftists who are siding with Hamas. These leftist Jews may have been pro-Israel and afraid of a second Holocaust, but their support for leftist policies led to the slaughter that horrifies them now.

What happened in Israel was not war. It was, instead, a grotesque violation of modern norms driven by people who have, for 1,500 years, proudly and unabashedly stated both their goal and their means: The goal is world domination, and the means are torturing and slaughtering men and boys, raping women and girls, enslaving those women and girls they don’t murder, and killing babies in their cradles.

This isn’t about territorial disputes or someone else’s colonialism. This is written into their most holy text, which has not undergone a single revision since their prophet first spoke his words. They did this in the 7th century, they did it two decades ago on September 11, they did it a decade ago to the Yazidi, they did it last weekend to the Israelis, and they’re chomping at the bit to do it to you.

But speaking of colonialism, since the Soviets embraced the “Palestinian” cause in the 1960s, for the left, Islamic jihad has been converted into “anti-colonialism.” Despite the fact that anyone with a scintilla of knowledge knows that, in Israel, it’s the Arabs who are the colonialists, there have been enough useless idiots in American institutions to ignore this fact and paint the Jews as the interlopers and the invading Arabs as the pathetic victims of Western colonialism. [...]

Of course, leftism isn’t just about Israel. It’s about everything, and there are few more enthusiastic leftists than Jews. For those who are not Jewish, it’s not always easy to understand that these leftists are “Jews In Name Only.” They love throwing around Yiddish words and boasting about fasting on Yom Kippur, but their values are informed by the Democrat party platform and the academic faculty lounge, not by the Torah (the first five books of the Bible), the Mishnah (the first rabbinical interpretation of the Torah), or the Talmud (the primary rabbinical interpretation of the Torah).

These leftist Jews fought against the Iraq War (a misbegotten war but one that, had it been carried to a full conclusion, might have had a better outcome), embraced the antisemitic Barack Obama, suffered from violent Trump Derangement Syndrome, headed academia’s institutions and sat in its faculty lounges, went cuckoo for the LGBTQ+ agenda, and organized groups such as “Jews for Justice for Palestinians.” Contrary to the myth of Jews as a smart people, these are stupid Jews.

Many of these leftists also likely couldn't have cared less about betrayals of Israel by the USA government, as Laura Hollis discusses. In any event, the argument's been made that these are, above all, ignoramuses who've sold out to repellent ideologies, no matter how horribly it comes back and bites in rear in the end.

Besides the above examples, there's also some Jewish communists in the USA who've supported anti-Israel positions and Hamas, and tragically may never reevaluate:

While most decent people responded with horror to the Hamas atrocities, the fringes responded with enthusiasm or defenses of the atrocities. The trouble though is that the Left stopped being a fringe and replaced liberalism as the driving ideological force of the Democratic Party. And the Hard Left became the driving force of the Left.

And the Hard Left supports Hamas. That’s uncomfortable for liberals and even leftists to deal with, but now even anti-Israel leftists are having trouble coping with the fact that their movement supports the rape and murder of Jews.

Now by anti-Israel Left, I don’t mean merely leftists that are critical of Israel. I mean leftists who built their careers on hating Israel and justifying the terrorists. Now that Hamas invaded a music festival, kidnapped, killed and raped women, and kidnapped an elderly “peace activist”, and massacred people like them on kibbutzim, they’re shocked that their ideological allies and friends are good with it.

But they'll never abandon leftism? If not, that's one of the saddest parts of this whole affair.

Update: and who knows if they care what Muslims in Britain are doing, tearing down posters showing Israelis who'd been murdered/kidnapped/raped by Hamas? Or that taxpayer dollars were sent to the terrorist organization?

A fact-based movie from India that's important to see

There's a new movie produced in India (via Front Page) about a horrible tragedy where Muslims brainwashed Hindu and Christian girls into serving jihadism:

The trailer of The Kerala Story was released on April 26 and has led to reactions and controversy. The film by Vipul Amrutlal Shah aims to tell the tale of how women from the Indian state of Kerala women were tricked and trafficked to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in the conflict zone of Syria. The film directed by Sudipto Sen traces the journey of four female college students in Kerala who become part of the Islamic State.

Kerala leader of opposition V.D. Satheesan demanded that the film should not be allowed to be released.

The film especially showcases certain cases of how ‘love jihad’ was used by ISIS to lure 32,000 women to Syria. The trailer shows how men were brainwashed to woo Hindu and Christian women of Kerala in the name of love, convert them to Islam and convince them to join ISIS and other Islamic war zones. The shocking incidents occurred between 2018-19, when a rising number of Kerala youths had come under the influence of ISIS. [...]

The movie is based on a tragedy where around 32,000 women went missing in Kerala. They were allegedly brainwashed and lured by Muslim men, who married and converted them, radicalised them and later deployed them in terror missions in India and abroad for ISIS.

All must be done to ensure that this movie continues to be available for the public to see, and that there's security and safety for the public going to view it at the movie theaters. The leftists who're calling for censorship of this film should be condemned for what they're leading to, and should cease all attacks on it, period. The filmmakers have done the right thing to tackle the issue of women being lured into horrifying situations by Mohammedans and then put in the middle of war zones, making things worse.

Much of Malmo becomes Muslim enclave

Sweden's 3rd largest city, Malmo, is on its way to becoming a whole Islamic enclave:

The EU is still there, but the "fission" has already taken place in the country at the forefront of multiculturalism, open borders and hospitality. Since 1980, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, half of all residence permits granted by Sweden - nearly 400,000 - have gone to reunite families from various geopolitical disaster areas. Many of these places were in the Islamic world: Yugoslavia, Somalia, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan the main ones.

[...] And so the famous "land of the right of asylum" ended up with suburbs where today only one in ten inhabitants is Swedish and at Lund University academics of Egyptian origin such as Sameh Egyptson publish research on the project of Islamization of Swedish society through demographic and cultural changes.

[...] Olof, a local shopkeeper, reads his newspaper in a café in the Triangeln shopping centre. Like many of his compatriots, he believes that there are too many immigrants: 'We Swedes are already a minority in Malmö,' he says. In fact, in this third largest city in the kingdom, with a population of 357,000, 57 percent were born abroad or of foreign parents, and 184 nationalities are represented."

In Malmö the new figures for the age groups 5-9 and 10-14 are more than 68 percent foreigners.

According to data from Statistics Sweden (SBC), 34.62 percent of all inhabitants in Sweden at the beginning of the year have foreign ancestry of up to one generation. They are therefore first or second generation immigrants.

The majority of students in Malmö have a migrant background. The news prompts calls for new educational facilities where migrants can study in their mother tongue, Arabic, because Swedish is now a "minority language". As early as 2010, the Wall Street Journal warned that Sweden would become “Eurabia”.

“Jews leave Sweden's third largest city,” writes Swedish newspaper Nyheter Idag. Malmö's Jewish community is expected to dissolve by 2029. An American journalist, Andy Ngo, paid a visit: “I stopped by the synagogue in Malmö. I was greeted by a metal security fence and CCTV. The synagogue was attacked with explosives. The closer the GPS told me I was to my destination, the more veils I saw and the less Swedish I heard. In Rinkeby, girls and some little girls wear headscarves. Cafés are basically men-only spaces, and one restaurant in the city center offers separate seating, with a tent for 'families', a euphemism for women."

In other words, this burg in Sweden is being turned into a variation on Saudi Arabia, as it was up until a number of years ago, before they began easing up on their offensive restrictions against women. Now, a terrible situation's come up in Sweden that's going to turn the whole country into a disaster.

21 years after 9-11, lessons still unlearned

Bruce Thornton's written about how the elitists running the political store in the USA still learn no lessons from the horrible tragedy on September 11, 2001:

Twenty-one years have passed since the worst terrorist attack ever on American soil, and our foreign policy establishment and ruling elite still have not learned the lessons of that horrendous carnage. The Romans thought even fools could learn from experience, but our credentialed mavens can’t break free of their institutional orthodoxy and narratives. As a consequence, our foreign policy and international relations continue to put our national security at risk.

This misinterpretation of modern Islam’s traditional resistance to infidel hegemony began with the Iranian Revolution, the first of subsequent jihadist attacks on the U.S. that culminated on 9/11. The West filtered that religious revolution through the old ideas of anticolonialism and national self-determination encoded in the Versailles settlement. Barack Obama, in his cringing flattery of Islam during his 2009 Cairo speech, recycled this stale received wisdom, blaming “tensions” between Islam and the West on “colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations.”

[...] Oblivious to this traditional religious imperative, during the Nineties the Clinton administration didn’t take seriously enough the string of al Qaeda’s anti-American rhetoric he backed up with violent attacks on our military and diplomatic personnel. Instead, the Clinton team treated them as criminal matters, or heretical distortions of Islam by renegade Muslims, rather than as salvos in a jihad that climaxed in 9/11.

On the other hand, the George Bush administration, after its swift punishment of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq, changed the goals of those conflicts into a misguided, naïve effort to democratize peoples whose creed and its supreme law, Koranic-based sharia, are incompatible with liberal democracy and its cargo of religious tolerance, sex equality, unalienable rights, and separation of church and state. The latter was particularly myopic, given that, as Karsh writes, Islam “was inextricably linked with the creation of a world empire and its universalism was inherently imperialist. It did not distinguish between temporal and religious powers.” Muhammad could thus “cloak his political ambitions with a religious aura.”

This mistake by Bush’s foreign policy team was in part the fruit of the wrong lessons taken from the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, which arrogantly encouraged the primacy of the Western liberal “rules-based internal order” as the master political paradigm for the whole world. And this hubristic mentality persisted all the way to Joe Biden’s skedaddle from Afghanistan last year, where the U.S. had sponsored seminars on women’s liberation for Afghan males.

Of course, Bush also made clear where he really stands when last year, he used the Memorial service as a cheap excuse to attack Trump, no matter how indirectly, and soiled what should've been a solemn moment. It was most utterly insensitive to 9-11 Families, not to mention victims of the botched Afghanistan withdrawal. And then of course, there's the problem of a liberal guilt mentality that only applies to the west, but not to Islamic forces continuing to occupy countries they captured in the past:

Moreover, whereas the Western colonial powers abandoned colonialism and continue to provide aid to their ex-colonies, Muslims still inhabit and rule most of the territories they conquered centuries ago: all of North Africa, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, and Turkey had been Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian, i.e. proto-Western, for as long as nearly 3000 years before Islam even existed.

Nor is this ancient history: Muslim Turkey still occupies Northern Cyprus, which it invaded and has illegally occupied and colonized since 1974, ethnically cleansing Greek Cypriots; destroying, looting, and vandalizing more than 550 churches; and refusing to this day to inform the Greeks about the fate of over 2000 of their compatriots who disappeared during the invasion. Bullying Israel over its “occupation” of the lands their ancestors inhabited 3000 years ago reveals the West’s shameful sacrifice of history and justice in order to pursue its own economic and ideological interests.

Yes, that's another sad topic to consider. Northern Cyprus continues to remain under Turkish rule, and nobody in the west does anything to reverse it. And back in the USA, who knows what more mistakes will be made, as the elitists continue their own misguided approach to the issues?

If Afghanistan was abandoned, will Ukraine be next, and US weapons captured by Russia?

Clifford May discusses the history involving Afghanistan since 9-11, and how faux-president Joe Biden has trashed everything previous US governments worked for in establishing a more democratic country:

Prior to 9/11, influential voices in the foreign policy community argued that terrorism was not a serious national security threat, merely the weapon of the weak, a way for those without fighter jets and tanks to call attention to their “legitimate grievances.”

After 9/11, I thought that debate would end. I also thought it had become obvious that “grievances, legitimate or not, provide no license for the murder of other people’s children”—a moral insight conveyed to me by the late Jeane Kirkpatrick, an eminent foreign policy scholar and the first woman to serve as America’s ambassador to the United Nations.

My optimism turned out to be unjustified. To this day, there are those—U.N. officials emphatically included—who condone terrorism for causes they favor, euphemizing it as “resistance.”

And I certainly never expected that the United States, having removed the Taliban from power in the autumn of 2001, would usher that Al-Qaeda-aligned terrorist organization back into power.

Unfortunately, failure to remain vigilant even within the USA is exactly why it happened. Of course, George W. Bush Jr. had some blame to shoulder, because he wasn't truly dedicated, seeing as he even did what to damage Israel back in the day, and sought excuses and opportunities to attack Trump indirectly during the past year. Why, what did his administration do to improve education across the USA during that time? That's another reason we've reached such a low moral point.

Last week, a report from Republican members of the House Foreign Affairs committee led by Rep. Michael McCaul revealed that at least 800 Americans were left behind. Thousands of American-trained Afghan military personnel, including elite commandos, fled to Iran where, we must assume, they spilled their guts—figuratively if not literally—to the regime’s Ministry of Intelligence.

That's another bad omen. And it's offensive how the UN's not called out on its serving as a haven for barbarism apologists, which includes workers who committed sexual abuse, and the problem has still continued even this year. The UN is a most evil organization indeed.

The abandonment of Afghanistan has cast serious and lasting doubt on America’s credibility, reliability and will to prevail.

Perhaps not just coincidentally, Russian President Vladimir Putin is now waging an all-out war of aggression against Ukraine.

China’s President Xi Jinping, having stripped the people of Hong Kong of the rights his government had guaranteed them by treaty, is eyeing Taiwan more hungrily than ever.

Iran’s rulers openly threaten to assassinate Americans on American soil and a fatwa issued by the regime’s first “supreme leader” led to an attack on British author Salman Rushdie while he was speaking on an American stage earlier this month. Yet Biden continues to offer those rulers hundreds of billions of dollars in exchange for a vague promise that they will delay their nuclear weapons program.

Afghanistan, once a fledgling free state, is now once again a totalitarian Islamic emirate. Afghans who sided with Americans are being hunted and murdered. Dire poverty is spreading throughout the land. Women are again being brutalized.

And this has all given encouragement to Chomskyites, tragically enough. Worst, Biden's bunch abandoned tons of USA-manufactured weapons and other products for the Taliban to now exploit, as Elle Reynolds explains, and she wonders if Ukraine could suffer a similar fate, due to improper ability by foreign governments to defend the country from Russia's attack:

A new Department of Defense inspector general report released last week estimated that the Afghan government possessed $7.12 billion worth of equipment paid for by U.S. taxpayer dollars when it fell roughly a year ago, “much of which has since been seized by the Taliban.”

[...] The actual amount of equipment left in Taliban hands may be far higher than the $7 billion figure. In August 2021, Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., reported the abandoned equipment cost more than $85 billion.

And now, the question is whether all the monetary aid sent to Ukraine will be worth it, because what if Russia gets their mitts on it?

Fast-forward a year, and the Biden administration and Congress have been shipping bushels of money to Ukraine as the Eastern European country fights its Russian invaders. If Russia continues to capture Ukrainian soil, what’s to keep American weapons and equipment from falling into the wrong hands just as they did in Afghanistan?

A valid point. But, what can one expect when refusal to do a military raid on these autocracies and work to establish more democratic systems is the position still in use? This is exactly why you have migrants coming from countries like Venezuela and Bolivia to the USA, and let's not forget Cuba. Should even their Castro-organized dictatorship be allowed to continue? Obviously not, yet the USA never did anything to have the Cuban dictatorship toppled. As long as such regimes continue to last, it's no wonder modern democracy will eventually crumble.

A deal with Iran would endanger America as much as the rest of the world

Benjamin Netanyahu made the case in a video against the deal Biden's bunch is looking to make with Iran:

The Biden administration’s push for a nuclear deal with Iran would grant the Islamic Republic a “nuclear arsenal” in addition to billions in funds for sponsoring terror, according to former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who warned Americans of the threat Iran would pose toward them and the world.

Addressing “every American family” in a video clip he shared on Twitter Sunday, Netanyahu called “the desperate rush to sign this flawed nuclear agreement” with the Islamic Republic of Iran both “absurd” and “downright dangerous.”

Referring to Iran’s claim of responsibility for a missile barrage that struck early Sunday near a sprawling U.S. consulate complex in the northern Iraqi city of Erbil, the former Israeli prime minister blasted the current administration’s willingness to continue pursuing a deal under such circumstances.

“Yesterday, Iran fired missiles in the vicinity of the American consulate in Iraq, and the U.S. continues to charge ahead along with the other powers, to sign a nuclear agreement that will give the ayatollahs a nuclear arsenal,” he said.

He also warned that a revival of the 2015 nuclear deal would “relieve sanctions” and grant the theocratic state “hundreds of billions of dollars in order to continue the terror that they waged yesterday and wage every day throughout the Middle East and the world.”

Netanyahu deemed the pending deal more harmful than the original one, which offered Iran sanctions relief in return for promises not to enrich uranium beyond a certain level for a limited period, claiming it would aid Iran’s ability to produce even more weapons.

“This agreement is even worse than its predecessor,” he said, “because in three years’ time under this agreement, Iran will be a threshold nuclear state.”

“It will have enough enriched uranium to create dozens and dozens of nuclear bombs,” he added, “and it will have the ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) to deliver them to any place in the United States.”

Calling the prospect of such a scenario “unbelievable,” Netanyahu warned it would pose a threat to America as well as to the rest of the world.

“It’s not merely unacceptable,” he said. “It endangers not only my country, Israel, but your country, the United States, and the entire world.”

Yet Biden's fraudulent government continues with paper-tiger policies that're certain to precipitate all the possible harm that's bound to come from this horrific faustian pact. It's an absolute tragedy the Democrats had to commit election fraud, bringing this horrible situation about.

Syrian jihadist in UK nearly attacked women's hospital

A tregedy nearly occurred at a Liverpool women's hospital, when an attempted suicide bomber blew himself up near there:

The man who exploded a homemade bomb outside Liverpool Women’s Hospital has been revealed to be a Middle Eastern asylum seeker named Emad Al Swealmeen.

Emad Al Swealmeen, who died in the blast on Sunday inside a taxi cab has been revealed to have been a failed asylum seeker reportedly of Syrian and Iraqi heritage.

Four other men were arrested under the Terrorism Act in Liverpool but were subsequently released from police custody without any charges, the BBC reported.

It's fortunate no innocent lives were lost, but tragic the police made no serious attempt to incarcerate the other suspects. All that does is ensure more chaos will occur in the future.

Ideology is even more dangerous than the terrorists themselves

Rachel Avraham makes a crucial point about Islam:

Mendi Safadi, head of the Safadi Center for International Diplomacy, Research, Public Relations and Human Rights, stated in a recent interview: “Terrorism is spreading and we are engaged in a pursuit of those who commit terrorist actions but we have still not learned that terrorism is based on an ideology, not people. We have still not learned the essential basis of the War on Terror. We still have not given the victims of terrorism the consolation that there will be no more victims. What more needs to happen until we understand that the solution is in our hands and that we only need the courage to face up to it until terrorism is destroyed?

“We cannot fight against terrorism using democratic tools and human rights laws,” he explained. “We clearly see that a radical terrorist state is building an atomic bomb and in the West, they are exploring how to take care of it without collateral damage. They do this as followers of the mullahs' regime shout "Death to America and death to Israel" while educating their people to hate and be bloodthirsty.”

Safadi believes that the best way to take care of this threat is to go after the ideology that stands behind the terror.

The question remains: If the root of Islamist terrorism is the ideology and not the people, then why until now have we gone after the terrorists but not their ideology? According to Dr. Mordechai Kedar of Bar-Ilan University, “The ideology is embedded in the religion. Jihad is an obligation, a mitzvah. There are all kinds of modern interpretations, such as jihad being against one's evil inclinations or the devil but these do not convince those who are sure that jihad is against the infidel. It is a very big problem to fight against the ideology, so we take the weapons from them and convince them that the damage that will be caused to Muslims and Islam will be much worse than the gain from jihad. It is called a credible threat. Only credible threats will change their decision.”

To prove this point, Kedar explained that the only time Iran halted its nuclear program was when former US President George W. Bush invaded Iraq and the Iranians thought that they were going to be next: “But once they understood that America was a paper tiger that was going to do nothing against them, they resumed it. Economic measures will not make them change their policies. They only have to survive a year with the sanctions and just hope that Trump won’t be re-elected. Trump’s strategy will only work if he is re-elected. Nevertheless, the ideology is very well-rooted in the culture. It is 14 centuries old. You cannot tell them to leave basic tenets of Islam. It is not easy at all. This is what makes it very hard.”

This is exactly why distinctions have to be made between good or bad religions, along with ideologies. And, to be transparent about what elements exist within a specific religion/ideology. Otherwise, how will you convince anybody, say, that Judaism's a religion worth upholding by contrast?

New Jersey man arrested for lending support to Hamas

A possible Muslim convert in New Jersey was arrested for making threats against a pro-Israeli rally and supporting Hamas:

A New Jersey man who threatened to shoot everyone at a pro-Israel rally and said he wanted to “bomb Trump Tower,” was arrested Wednesday on charges of trying to provide support to Hamas.

Jonathan Xie, 20, of Basking Ridge, allegedly had social media accounts loaded with terror propaganda, according to the FBI. The agency said he had also declared support for Syrian leader Bashar al Assad, former Iraq leader Saddam Hussein and North Korea.

It sounds like he's also a communist supporter. And another young man who's thrown away his future for the sake of evil. If we continue to allow this kind of indoctrination, many lives will be ruined.

UK citizens who battle against ISIS to defeat it now face prosecution

The UK's Orwellian communism continues, extending to brave soldiers who've fought to defeat Islamofascism (Hat tip: Jihad Watch):

BRAVE Westerners who dropped their cosy lives to fight ISIS alongside the UK’s Kurdish allies face being treated like returning jihadis.

The UK is among many countries including Germany, The Netherlands and Australia, who penalise volunteers who risked their lives.

Former Brit squaddie Joe Robinson, 25, was arrested on holiday on trumped-up terrorism charges in 2017.

His partner Mira Rojkan, a Bulgarian citizen studying Law, was also arrested and accused of engaging in terrorist propaganda.

Rojkan was given a suspended sentence, the BBC reported Robinson’s mother as saying.

Robinson, who previously served in Afghanistan with the Duke of Lancaster Regiment, previously admitted fighting ISIS but went on to deny he acted alongside the Kurdish militia.

‘I AM NOT A CRIMINAL’

He wasn’t jailed in the UK, but last September he was jailed for seven-and-a-half years in Turkey.

He remained on bail as he appealed his sentence, but weeks before Christmas, he told the BBC he fled Turkey.

He said: “I could not accept the sentence and charges as I am not a criminal” adding “I had to take matters into my own hands.”

Although officials haven’t yet jailed returning volunteers in the UK, many others have faced intense scrutiny and prosecution upon their return.

And it’s not the same in the US.

A former US Marine claims they’re praised for fighting ISIS.

Havel Zafer, who served as a US Marine in Afghanistan told The Times it’s easier for Americans to join without any threat of prosecution.

He added: “In fact we’d likely get embraced for what we were doing when we got home.”

Even when he was injured on the battlefield, he recalled American medics “laughing and joking with him”, while others noted he was doing “good” work.

In sharp contrast, terrorists are the ones allowed to go free, and Theresa May's proven once again what a phony "conservative" she really is, so long as this backwards Orwellian nightmare is allowed to continue.

Bush Senior was bad for Israel

Former US president George H.W. Bush died this past week, and predictably, there was a lot of whitewashing of his exact records on foreign policy, which includes his atrocious conduct towards Israel, as well as that of his son, Dubya:

“Go to hell.” That’s what George W. answered a reporter, when questioned about what he planned to tell the Israelis, as he was about to leave on his 1998 Middle East trip. Was he joking? Let’s remember, George W. previously had said in 1993, “heaven is open only to those who accept Jesus Christ,” while discussing his decision to become “born again,” as reported in the Houston Post at the time.

And let’s not forget his heavy campaigning in Michigan (home of the largest Arab-American community) before the 2000 election, his family’s oil interests, and deep ties with the Arab community in America and the Middle East. Then, there was George W’s open support for a Palestinian state during his presidency, the first American president to come out of the closet on the issue.

As the saying goes, “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.”

So, after a cursory look at George W. Bush’s attitudes to Jews, and Israel, let’s look at his recently deceased father, George H.W. Bush, his friends and family.

Well, for starters, there’s the company H.W. kept, for example James Baker who said, “F*** the Jews, they didn’t vote for us anyways.” James Baker was George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of State.

Why didn’t H.W. criticize Baker’s statement?

And H.W. let Baker publicly berate Israeli PM Yitzhak Shamir, “When you’re serious about peace, call us,” giving the number for the White House switchboard. Later, as a friend of the family, he acted as a political advisor to Jeb Bush, when he ran for governor in Florida.

George H.W. Bush will go down in Jewish History as the American president who forced Israel into a subservient position and endangered millions of Jews.

During the 1991 Gulf War, Shamir wanted the communication codes, so that Israeli pilots could contact their American counterparts, and avoid a friendly fire scenario. Bush refused, forcing Shamir’s hand, not to respond to Saddam Hussein’s scud missile fire on Israel. Bush sent patriot missiles, and insisted that Israel let America take care of it. That may be the main turning point, in the Israeli mentality, from “we fight our own wars,” to a growing sense of dependence on Uncle Sam.

Bush Sr. damaged morale by acting as though literally nobody should even think about offering altruistic aid to the USA, as though the country could literally handle everything unquestioned, and may have even damaged the USA's ability to manage some subjects properly too.

As the late Rabbi Meir Kahane quipped, “Once we were people who had faith in the burning bush, and now we depend upon George Bush?”

H.W. also pushed off an Israeli $10 billion aid request for loan guarantees, to help settle the million plus Soviet Jewish refugees flooding Israel, after the fall of the Iron Curtain. He insisted Israel stop building “settlements,” and extorted from Shamir, an agreement that Israel would participate in the 1991 Madrid “peace” Conference. Which led to the Oslo Process, the Palestinian Authority, Arafat’s return, and the Death Machine, Israelis suffer with today. After a more cooperative prime minister was elected in Israel in 1992, Yitzhak Rabin, the loan guarantees went through.

Now that too was all an utter abomination, and brought us down very low as a result.

There's also Prescott Bush's historical record to consider, which isn't all that different from Henry Ford's:

But the George HW’s apple didn’t fall far either…

The accusations against HW’s father, Sen. Prescott Bush, go well beyond dislike for Jews and discriminatory practices that were typical of New England WASP culture back then. It seems his father was involved with Hitler’s financiers in the later 1920s and 1930s.

Prescott Bush was co-founder and a director of at a New York bank, Union Banking Corp. (UBC), where German businessmen who supported the Nazis, stashed away millions. According to documents from the US National Archives made public in 2003, Bush was still a director at the bank, when its assets were frozen under the Trading With the Enemy Act in 1942.

It seems, the UBC was not so much a “bank” at all, but a “clearing house” for the many assets and enterprises, of German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, who later admitted to his role, in helping to finance the Third Reich.

The documents also reveal that Prescott Bush worked for, and was later a partner in, Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH). By the late 1930s, both BBH, which claimed to be the world's largest private investment bank, and UBC, had bought and shipped millions of dollars of gold, fuel, steel, coal and US treasury bonds to Nazi Germany, feeding and financing Hitler’s military build-up.

Yep, the Bush family's got quite a history alright. One that serves as an embarrassment to conservatives everywhere, though you could argue Bush Sr. was by no means a real conservative, but rather, an interloper.

This is why I can't feel sorry Bush Sr's no longer here, as he may have hurt the USA just as much as Israel back in the early 90s. There's certainly a reason why he only served one term, and it's a shame Clinton had to be the one to succeed him, as he made things much worse.

Just why should Turkey be trusted with middle eastern security?

Recep Erdogan supposedly wants to bring "peace, safety and stability" to Iraq and Syria:

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan vowed on Sunday to bring peace and safety to Iraq and areas in Syria not under Turkish control and said terrorist organizations in those areas would be eliminated.

Turkey, which has backed some rebel groups in Syria, has been working with Russia, which supports Syrian President Bashar al Assad, and Iran for a political resolution to the crisis.

It has so far carried out two cross-border operations along its border with Syria and set up a dozen military observations posts in the northern Syrian region of Idlib.

Oh please. What he really means is that Turkey wants to put those areas under their autocratic control, and while they may not allow jihad against Turkey, they certainly intend to continue ensuring jihadism will be able to thrive elsewhere, like in Europe. In fact, as Hot Air notes:

Erdogan has also been getting very friendly with Iran. He’s long since ceased being anything even remotely resembling a reliable ally, but now he seems to have given up on even attempting a pretense of it. He’s playing both sides against the middle at this point, alternately offering to mend fences with Europe and America while simultaneously dealing with our most dangerous adversaries. It’s true that we have the ability to put the squeeze on Turkey’s economy and we’ve been doing so. But when it comes to military considerations and the instability in that region, the sad reality is that we still need Turkey a lot more than they need America or the rest of NATO. Erdogan knows this and has grown increasingly arrogant.

Well that's why we don't need them anymore, and if we do, then first we have to topple Erdogan along with Iran's regime, because it's clear Turkey's now as dangerous as Iran is in their own way, and cannot be considered a legitimate government at this point. Erdogan's dictatorship must be recognized for what it is, hunned for their promotion of evil, and sanctions should be imposed upon them until they can be brought down. Ever since Erdogan came into power, they've been moving in the direction of evil, and no matter what they supposedly intend to do to terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq, they'll only replace their terror with that of their own.

An ISIS terrorist posed as a refugee to enter the USA

This is one creature who clearly wasn't screened before he was allowed to infiltrate, and the Obama administration likely had some accountability for that:

An ISIS fighter who posed as a refugee to get into the United States was arrested in California by FBI agents this week.

Before his detainment, forty-five year old Omar Ameen was wanted for the murder of an Iraqi police officer and officials allege he engaged in a number of terrorist activities in his home country. After entering the U.S. as a "refugee," Ameen attempted to obtain legal status to stay in the U.S.

"Ameen, originally of Rawah, in the Anbar province of Iraq, fled Iraq following the alleged murder, and later settled in Sacramento as a purported refugee. It is alleged that Ameen’s family supported and assisted the installation of al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) in Rawah, and that Ameen was a member of AQI and ISIS," the Justice Department released. "It is also alleged that he participated in various activities in support of those terrorist organizations, including helping to plant improvised explosive devices, and committing the murder that is the subject of the extradition request. Ameen concealed his membership in those terrorist groups when he applied for refugee status, and later when he applied for a green card in the United States."

Well now he can be sent back to face a death penalty, if Iraq'll give him one. These monsters have to be kept out of all countries that don't want barbarism to enter.

Son of an imam with feminist supporters ran a terrorist-training camp

I think this explains perfectly why today's leftist feminists must also be considered some of the most ignorant, vile people around, if this who they consider legitimate:

Already missing from the news cycle is the story of Muslim leader Siraj Wahhaj, who alerted authorities to the squalid conditions in New Mexico in which his son, two daughters, another man and woman, and 11 children were living.

Authorities arrived at the compound to some of the most horrifying conditions they had ever seen, and prosecutors identified the makeshift home as a training ground for militant children, including in carrying out school shootings. The imam’s son had been wanted for kidnapping his own four-year-old child, who had severe disabilities. The body of a young child was recovered from the site, but authorities have yet to verify its identity.

Siraj claims his son and daughters had strayed from his teachings of Islam, had somehow become radicalized, and were possibly dealing with mental illness. He presented himself as a peaceful and well-respected imam, careful to distance himself from the terrorist conditions in which his family was found. But the facts on that count are doubtful.

Who Is Siraj Wahhaj?

Born Jeffrey Kearse in Brooklyn, Wahhaj converted to the Nation of Islam in 1969, and changed his name to Jeffrey X12. He became a leader in the community and regularly taught that “white people are devils.” By 1975, he reigned in his outspoken racism toward white people and converted to a more orthodox Sunni Muslim, changing his name to the Arabic Siraj Wahhaj.

He is the founder of and an imam at Masjid At-Taqwa in Brooklyn, and is well known and respected, attracting Muslims from all over the world to hear him speak. In 1991, Wahhaj became the first Muslim to lead a prayer at the start of a session of the U.S. House of Representatives.

In that same year, he said, “As long as you remember that if you get involved in politics, you have to be very careful that your leader is for Allah. You don’t get involved in politics because it’s the American thing to do. You get involved in politics because politics are a weapon to use in the cause of Islam.”

Read the rest, and note how creatures like Linda Sarsour are allies and students of these horrific enemies too. It's clear the pere is no better than the fils, and doesn't consider his ideology to have any fault in leading to his son's own evils. That's why he must also be shunned for the terrible situations he's led to.