Tel-Chai Nation

As explained here, it looks like talk show host Bill Maher, who until now has been quite a leftist himself, is beginning to understand that the Democrats have gone off an irredeemably deep end when it comes to transsexuality obsession:

For at least 20 years, Bill Maher occupied the more left side of the Democrat party. However, as Elon Musk recently did, Maher is also discovering that the Democrat party has pulled so far left that all he can do is stare aghast at the flaming pile of nonsense that is his erstwhile political home. Maher is, ever so slowly and reluctantly, being red-pilled. Most recently, Maher has decided that the Democrats have gone way too far with transgenderism.

Maher’s take is interesting because he doesn’t have any religious or moral principles that argue against transgenderism. Moreover, as a good leftist, he certainly can’t say, as I regularly do, that transgenderism is a mental illness entirely unsupported by any medical or scientific findings. All he can do is point out that transgenderism’s sudden ascendency in society makes no sense at all. [...]

Over at Breitbart, John Nolte has written an interesting piece pointing out that people who were staples of the hard left are very publicly turning against it now. Maher is one of the people he names and, of course, Elon Musk. Other people taking a stand are Jeff Bezos, who attacked the White House for its ludicrous claim that taxing corporations will lower costs; Chris Rock, who attacked the victim mentality the left encourages; and Snoop Dogg, who pointedly ignored Karen Bass, the communist the Democrat party endorsed in the L.A. Mayoral race, instead pulling for Rick Caruso, a moderate Dem who used to be a Republican. Nolte also pointed to Netflix telling its woke employees to keep quiet; Spotify dumping the Obamas but keeping Joe Rogan; and Hulu refusing a Hillary-themed show.

Well it's good if some prominent leftists are beginning to realize this is not something healthy to uphold. And it'll be even better when they start clearly basing their arguments on science and biology. And they'll improve everything a lot more when they're willing to condemn papers like the NY Times for encouraging it at the expense of cohesion.

Reading this also reminded me of how the MSM's got responsibility to shoulder for enabling the crisis, and of this superficial, self-defeating article at a college paper from last year, which seemingly discusses digital damage to teens on social media, but all it says is:

When a teen’s emotions take a dark turn, it might be more than an age-appropriate bad mood. Over time, toxic social media exposure can build up and trigger eating disorders, anxiety attacks, substance abuse, suicidal thoughts and other problems. Pandemic pressures — health, isolation, uncertainty — have made social media’s influence even tougher to manage.

But lo and behold, it says nothing about children wanting to get sex-change operations due to influence over social media, psychologically or otherwise, which can also lead to a lot of misery in later life when they're indoctrinated into claiming they're the opposite sex. Yet what can you expect from these far-left universities? They're nothing but long run failures, and they'll never acknowledge what Maher thankfully has. It's practically why college papers should be boycotted as much as the NY Times and the Wash. Post, because they're not focusing on challenging issues either.

For now, it's good some prominent leftists are waking up to what a horror story the Democrats have become.

Labels: anti-americanism, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness, sexual violence, showbiz, United States