Tel-Chai Nation

Hugh Fitzgerald comments on how the continuation of Islamic immigration to Europe is leading to rightful anguish by the public:

More on those Muslim migrants, and the growing rage in Europe expressed by people fed up with their governments’ inability to deal with the Muslim migrant crisis, can be found here: “Continental Spring? Europe Could Be One Violent Migrant Incident Away From a Revolution,” by Anthony Grant, New York Sun, September 5, 2024:

Could Europe be facing its own version of the so-called Arab Spring? That era of uprisings and rebellions started with the despair — and suicide by fire — of a single Tunisian street vendor. It tore through the political fabric of much of the Middle East. In Europe today, disaffection with leaders seen as detached from the realities of migrant crime is roiling politics across the Continent.

Immigration, of course, isn’t the only issue. The spiraling cost of living — inflation and currency debasement — is among the issues that are contributing to the turmoil on the continent. In such an overheated climate as this, in any event, it would take only one incident to send people into the streets clamoring for common-sense change….

Why do these migrants want to go to Great Britain? The answer is simple: it is easier to enter the social services in the UK than in France. And the British are even more generous, in the cornucopia of benefits they lavish on these economic migrants posing as “asylum seekers,” than are the French. The free or subsidized housing is better, the medical coverage under the National Health Service more extensive, the family allowances and unemployment benefits larger in the UK than in France. If these migrants were genuine “asylum seekers,” they shouldn’t care which European country granted them asylum, but they are not asylum seekers; they are economic migrants, and will head for those countries in Europe where the benefits are biggest. These are the UK, Germany, and Sweden.

The Sun goes on to say that in France, President Emmanuel Macron did not “internalize” – that is, take to heart — the reasons for the National Rally’s success. This is the party of Marine Le Pen, and voters turned to it because it is the only party that directly addresses the Muslim immigration crisis, and promises to not only call a halt to that immigration, but to repatriate Muslims, beginning with those who have been convicted of crimes. Macron continues to avoid discussing the “Muslim migrant” problem, for he does not dare to echo the National Rally and Marine Le Pen. That would allow his opponents on the left, such as the antisemitic Jean-Luc Mélenchon, to paint him as a “racist” and “Islamophobe.” Instead, Macron is attempting to direct public attention away from Muslim migration and onto other matters.

Well Macron is just as pathetic as Melenchon, otherwise, he wouldn't have made that atrocious deal with him to keep Marine Le Pen's party from winning more seats. Whether what happened in the UK will happen in other European countries too remains to be seen. If it does, the results won't be pretty at all.

Update: and while we're on the topic, it's disgusting how the UK government decided to suspend weapons sales to Israel, another serious mistake the new Labour-led government's making.

Labels: anti-semitism, dhimmitude, Europe, France, germany, immigration, islam, jihad, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, Scandanavia, sexual violence, terrorism