Tel-Chai Nation

Pope Leo's unsuprisingly but very sadly revealed himself as the latest letdown to followers of Christ (Hat tip: Jihad Watch):

Questioned about a growing trepidation among western Christians about the growth of Islam outside of the Middle East, especially in predominantly Christian nations in the West, the pope said this was something touched on in his discussions with interfaith leaders in Turkey and Lebanon.

Many of these conversations “concentrated on the topic of peace and respect for people of different religions,” Leo said, noting that this has not always been the situation between the two religions, and that in Europe the fears are real.

However, he cautioned that oftentimes these fears are “generated by people who are against immigration and trying to keep out people who may be from another country, another religion, another race.”

“In that sense, I would say that we all need to work together. One of the values of this trip [is] precisely to raise the world’s attention to the possibility that dialogue and friendship between Muslims and Christians is possible,” he said.

Forget it, this completely obscures the issue of taqqiya (deception), and his failure to comprehend how illegal immigration has facilitated the entry of the Religion of Peace into many other countries speaks volumes. Leo's ignorance gets worse with the following (also via Jihad Watch):

Pope Leo said on Sunday that the only solution in the decades-long conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people must include a Palestinian state, reaffirming the Vatican’s position.

“We all know that at this time Israel still does not accept that solution, but we see it as the only solution,” Leo, the first US pope, told journalists on a flight from Turkey to Lebanon during his first in-flight press conference.

What's sad about dhimmis like Leo is that they're obsessed with all this "2-state solution" propaganda till the bitter end of time. And the way he dismisses the opposition of the Israeli public to it is truly awful. As a result, who can believe he's really on Christianity's side?

Labels: anti-americanism, anti-semitism, Christianity, dhimmitude, immigration, islam, Israel, jihad, Lebanon, misogyny, Moonbattery, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, turkey, United States, war on terror

Another honor murder occurred in the Netherlands, when a Muslim father and 2 sons murdered a daughter who dared to take up western style living:

Two brothers in the Netherlands are on trial for the alleged honor killing of their Syrian teenage sister, whom her family accused of living a Western lifestyle.

The two men are suspected of being involved in the murder of their sister, Ryan Al Najjar, who was drowned, the NL Times reported Thursday.

Twenty-three-year-old Mohamed and 25-year-old Muhanad are suspected of being involved in the murder along with their father, Khaled, who has been named the main suspect in the case. However, he allegedly fled to Syria after the killing, according to i24 News. The father will reportedly be tried in absentia. [...]

Prosecutors have recommended sentences of 25 years for the father and 20 years each for the brothers in the case, the i24 News article said, noting a verdict is expected in early January.

Ryan’s body was found in a lake in northern Netherlands. Her hands and feet were bound and an autopsy report said there was signs of strangulation and drowning. [...]

Islam has long been an issue in the Netherlands. In 2014, Breitbart News reported a Dutch right-wing member of parliament called for a purge of mosques.

“Dutch unity, identity and culture are being wrecked by immigration and incubation. We do not want Islam in the Netherlands,” Machiel de Graaf, a member of Dutch anti-immigration and anti-Islam Party for Freedom (PVV), stated at the time.

The Religion of Peace should definitely be purged from all of Europe and here in Israel too. In the meantime, it's sad that the satanic "father" may never be punished for his part in the crime, and the brothers may not receive the death sentence, which they deserve to receive for the abominable crime they committed against their sister.

Labels: dhimmitude, immigration, islam, misogyny, Netherlands, sexual violence, syria

More opposition to Islamic niqabs is growing among the French public:

Opposition to outward displays of devotion to Islam appears be growing among the French people, with a survey finding that seven in ten voters would back a ban on the wearing of veils in public.

The liberal secularist values of the Fifth French Republic look set for a collision course with the burgeoning Muslim population, which has been imported mainly from France’s former colonies in the Maghreb region of North Africa.

With surveys suggesting that second and third generations of migrants are becoming more radical in their adherence to the Qur’an as groups like the Muslim Brotherhood take advantage of the emerging parallel societies fostered in ethnic minority enclaves, the issue of assimilation has become more pressing.

One integrationist proposal which appears to be gaining ground is to expand the restrictions on Islamic garb in public. In 2011, the government prohibited full face covering veils such as the burqa or niqab, and now some argue that this should be extended to head coverings such as the hijab.

According to a CSA survey for Le Journal du Dimanche, 69 per cent of French voters would support a ban on the Islamic veil in public. This, the paper noted, was an increase of eight points since 2022, when 61 per cent said that they were in favour of such a move.

Unsurprisingly, supporters of right wing parties such as the populist National Rally and the establishment centre-right Les Républicains were most in favour of a law to bar veils in public, at 82 and 80 per cent respectively. This was followed by supporters of the liberal Macronist coalition, 65 per cent of whom backed a ban.

Overall, 51 per cent of leftist voters also favour a ban, yet, supporters of the hard left Greens or the radical France in Revolt (La France Insoumise/LFI) party of Morocco-born Jean-Luc Mélenchon were both opposed at 65 and 56 per cent.

I think that can tell quite a bit about modern communists, and that perhaps they don't consider their positions as good as those of the Religion of Peace. Suggesting they consider more barbaric ideologies better than their own. That's one of the main reasons the 21st century resurgence of communism is such an awful thing - because it's clearly willing to align itself with the Religion of Peace, which does consider socialism acceptable, and has thus led to considerable disaster for many years now.

This is good to know much of the French public does consider it bad that Islamic veils have become a wide influence. And serious action must be taken against that, along with immigration from countries run by the Religion of Peace too.

Labels: Africa, communism, dhimmitude, France, immigration, islam, jihad, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, war on terror

Armenia's deputy foreign minister paid a visit to Israel this week:

Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanyan arrived in Israel on Tuesday for a series of meetings aimed at exploring the possibility of turning a new page between the two nations.

Nevertheless, behind the diplomatic contacts lie deep disagreements and sensitivities that continue to shape the bilateral relationship.

Central to the agenda is the TRIPP project - a transport corridor concept originally promoted by Azerbaijan that has recently received public diplomatic support from President Donald Trump and several American political figures.

Jerusalem views this as an opportunity to examine regional cooperation alongside a measured rapprochement with Yerevan, which maintains close ties with Iran.

However, alongside the desire to advance joint projects, several key issues continue to cast a shadow over relations.

Antisemitism and the Azerbaijan factor

Reports of vandalism against the Jewish center and synagogue in Yerevan, including arson attempts and hate graffiti, have surfaced in recent years. According to sources in the local Jewish community, some of those involved described their actions as a protest against Israeli arms sales to Azerbaijan.

Concurrently, an Anti-Defamation League (ADL) poll found a high rate of antisemitic attitudes among adults in Armenia. However, local community representatives emphasize that Jewish religious life continues freely and that authorities do not pursue a hostile policy toward them.

For officials in Jerusalem, the disparity between official reassurances and the attacks on the ground remains a lingering concern. [...]

The Iranian connection

In the regional arena, Armenia’s ties with Iran remain a central factor in its relationship with Jerusalem. Due to its geographic isolation, Yerevan relies on Iran for trade and energy routes.

Among other things, a "gas-for-electricity" agreement has been in place for years and has been extended until 2030. Bilateral trade volume has reached approximately $700 million annually in recent years, with Armenia aiming to cross the $3 billion threshold.

Western publications, including mentions in OFAC-related documents, have pointed to possible Iranian use of Armenia for sanction-evasion logistics. Last year, opposition reports surfaced regarding a potential $500 million arms deal, alleging the provision of Iranian Shahed drones to Yerevan. While the Armenian government officially denied these claims, the sensitivity surrounding the Tehran connection continues to be a significant factor in the Israeli approach to Armenia.

Yes, this is very disturbing and serious, and Armenia's government is doing something very offensive by spending taxpayer money for buying anything from Iran. Yet even when it comes to Israel, they're doing something terribly wrong by providing any kind of weaponry to Azerbaijan. And if both sides really want to improve relations, diplomatic or otherwise, that's why they have to reevalute their connections with Islamist sources, period. There's only so much Israel could've done on its part years ago to minimize the damage, yet failed to do, and that's hurt relations with a country that could have some good allies available till this day.

Since this subject has come about, it should also be noted that propagandist Rachel Avraham, quite a whitewasher of Azerbaijan's Islamism already as it is, recently published another item supposedly concerned about the Muslim Brotherhood, and then she demolishes whatever impact she supposedly wants to convey with the following:

Numerous reports from intelligence agencies and parliamentarians indicate that the Muslim Brotherhood incites violence, encourages radicalization, and recruits young people to participate in conflicts in Africa and Asia (Nigeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh). The Muslim Brotherhood does not represent true Islam but supports extremist ideologies and networks. Prominent European experts and human rights defenders delivered inspiring speeches in front of the International Criminal Court, calling for a ban on the Muslim Brotherhood movement, which is showing its global threat to peace and security.

Well, talk about insulting people's intellects! I guess she's not a fan of Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer's research either, huh? And it won't be shocking if Avraham's not particularly concerned about NYC's new Muslim mayor either. What Avraham's written strongly suggests she's never read the koran, or she'd know what sort of horrific verses are published inside it. This is one of the leading reasons I cannot stand Avraham, who's done more harm than good to relations with Israel and Armenia as a result of her apologia not just for Azerbaijan, but also for the Religion of Peace. Why do any news sources keep hiring her?

Labels: anti-semitism, Armenia, Christianity, dhimmitude, iran, islam, Israel, jihad, Judaism, Knesset, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, war on terror

NYC's first Muslim mayor Mamdani, unsurprisingly, would not be clear about how the Religion of Peace played a part in the murder of a National Guardswoman by an illegal immigrant from Afghanistan in the District of Columbia:

New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani is facing a torrent of condemnation over his public statement addressing the murder of West Virginia National Guard Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, who succumbed to her injuries after being shot, allegedly by Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national admitted under President Joe Biden’s ‘Operation Allies Welcome’ program.

In a post on X, Mamdani wrote, “I’m devastated to learn of the passing of Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, a member of the West Virginia National Guard. She was only twenty years old. As families across the nation come together today to celebrate Thanksgiving, let us take a moment to think of those in West Virginia who have been plunged into unimaginable grief.”

Nowhere in the statement did Mamdani mention that Beckstrom was shot, allegedly by an Afghan migrant who was accused of shouting “Allahu Akbar” before opening fire on her and 24-year-old Andrew Wolfe near the White House. Beckstrom died Thursday evening from injuries sustained in the attack. The suspect, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is in the hospital under heavy guard and may face the death penalty, according to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. [...]

Despite the severity of the attack, the United Nations issued a post on social media hours later reaffirming that seeking asylum is a “human right,” without acknowledging the victims or the shooting in D.C. Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board urged against “collective punishment,” cautioning that Afghan refugees “shouldn’t be blamed for the violent act of one man,” even as they acknowledged the Biden administration’s chaotic withdrawal may have undermined proper vetting procedures.

These latest remarks aren’t the first time Mamdani has drawn widespread rebuke for his statements. On October 7, 2025 — the second anniversary of the Hamas massacre of over 1,100 Israelis — Mamdani issued a statement that accused Israel of launching a “genocidal war.” His post condemned the United States for its alliance with Israel and labeled the Jewish state’s military response “war crimes.” Elected officials, Israeli diplomats, Jewish religious leaders, and conservative media figures called his remarks antisemitic and accused him of serving as a “mouthpiece for Hamas propaganda.”

And the WSJ has clearly proven they've lost all common sense to boot. This is disgusting, also because the UN is erasing the victims no matter what they say, and Mamdani is once again proving the bad omen he'll doubtless be when he assumes office of mayor. He owes the woman's family a huge apology, and tragically, it's unlikely he ever will say he's sorry.

Labels: Afghanistan, anti-americanism, dhimmitude, immigration, islam, jihad, military, misogyny, Moonbattery, msm foulness, New York, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, UN corruption, United States, White House

Mark Tapson's reviewing Robert Spencer's new book, "Holy Hell", which is about the crisis of sexual violence employed in the Muslim world, and the non-Muslims who practically normalize it on their part:

Last year in France, three Muslim boys kidnapped a Jewish girl on her way home from school. One of the attackers reportedly told the victim, “I know you’re not Muslim… So, what religion are you?” When she told them, they called the girl a “dirty Jew” and proceeded to gang-rape her, which they filmed. Afterward the boys asked the girl to convert to Islam and made her swear by Allah that she would tell no one.

But she reported the crime, and in the trial this past June, two of the boys were given seven- and nine-year prison sentences for the gang rape of a minor on the basis of religion. They were 13 at the time of the crime. The third boy, who had been 12, was sentenced not to prison but to five years in an educational facility, because he was “below the age of criminal responsibility.” The presiding judge noted, “There is no doubt that [the victim] would not have been assaulted or raped if she had not been Jewish.”

Why were the rapists so intent on verifying that their victim was non-Muslim? Why did they denigrate her Jewishness? And why did they insist she convert to Islam?

The explanation lies in the riveting, brand new book Holy Hell: Islam’s Abuse of Women and the Infidels Who Enable It, an urgent, fearless exposé by the indefatigable Robert Spencer. It irrefutably demonstrates Islam’s theological justification for rape, sexual abuse, and sexual enslavement of non-Muslim girls and women worldwide.

[...] Spencer begins, in an introduction titled “The West’s Rape Crisis,” by explaining why rape rates in Muslim countries are generally extremely low. First, many rapes there go unreported because the behavior involved simply isn’t considered a crime. Second, the Qur’an specifically allows for the rape of non-Muslim women as a legitimate sexual outlet for Muslim men. Again, such activity is not viewed as criminal.

Spencer goes on to note that Islamic scholars defend Qur’anic passages asserting that Muslims may marry, or simply have sexual relations with, “those whom you acquire through war,” for children or women taken captive – “those whom your right hands possess” – thus become the spoils of war, and consent therefore is simply not a factor.

Non-Muslim women also contribute to their own victimization – or so Muslim scholars declare – by not obeying Islam’s modesty laws. Wearing the veil is viewed as protection against sexual molestation; women who do not cover themselves are considered fair game. Just as with consent, male self-restraint is simply not a factor.

The judge's note about the victim's ethnicity, unfortunately, is very naive. What if the victim were Armenian? Considering what a horror the Armenian Holocaust during WW1 was like, it's stupid to say the victim would not have been raped if she hadn't been of a certain background or dressed in a certain way. In a related subject, Hugh Fitzgerald comments on how one of the Muslim boys who raped a Jewish girl had his sentence commuted, and of course it's a bad thing, no matter his age:

There was no previous “integration” into the larger society, and there will be no “reintegration” for these moral monsters when they are released. They’ll go right back into their Muslim society, treated by other Muslims as victims, and feeling sorry for themselves that they were ever punished for raping a Jewish girl who, for being who she is, a Jewish girl, deserved the treatment she received. In prison, among older Muslims, these two boys are likely to become more fanatical in their faith.

Let’s be clear: Muslims, with a handful of exceptions, do not want to integrate into the larger society of Infidels. They are taught in the Qur’an that they are the “best of peoples” (3:110) and non-Muslims are the “most vile of created beings.” (98:6) Why would the “best of peoples” want to adopt the values and mores of those who are “the most vile of created beings”? And why would they want even to be friendly with those non-Muslims, when the Qur’an tells them not to “take Christians and Jews as friends, for they are friends only with each other”? (5:51)

The third boy was only 12, younger than the others and according to German law “below the age of criminal responsibility.” Instead of prison, he will spend five years in an “educational facility,” that is, a special school for underage malefactors. He won’t change. Whatever he is taught in that school, it will not shake him from the conviction that Muslims can do what they like with infidel girls, and especially with the despised Jewish girls.

This is why in the USA, there's laws for trying children as adults, depending on the severity of the crime. Of course, if the boy won't change, that's because nobody will give him corporal punishment or proper psychological treatment and persuasion to stop adhering to Islam. And if not, is it any wonder that incarceration in an "educational" facility will fail?

Labels: anti-americanism, anti-semitism, dhimmitude, islam, jihad, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, sexual violence, terrorism

Some senators in the French parliament are urging increase of defense against Islamofascist infiltration:

This week, a working group of 29 French senators submitted a 107-page report to the President of Les Républicains (LR) in the Senate, Mathieu Darnaud, warned that “Islamism is an obstacle to our national cohesion” and that fresh measures will be required to combat the infiltration by groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Le Figaro reported.

The report, led by LR Senator Jacqueline Eustache-Brinio, said that its research, which consisted of interviews with former intelligence officers to former radical Islamists, “revealed that Islamist infiltration strategies rely on systematic double-speak, infiltration of public institutions (administration, education, sports), and the instrumentalization of democratic freedoms.”

Islamist networks, including the Muslim Brotherhood, are “structured around a secret pyramid of about one hundred sworn members” who are tasked with influencing the mind of at least 100,000 Muslims in France through between 100 and 200 mosques tied to the radical cause, the report claimed.

Thus, there is an urgen[t] need for a “comprehensive republican rearmament in the face of the Islamist offensive. This rearmament must be intellectual, legal, administrative, and political,” they argued.

It comes after a major report published in May from French intelligence found that the Muslim Brotherhood has been engaging in a “Western conquest strategy” in France over the past seven decades, placing operatives in national and EU level government posts, in NGOs, and within community institutions of Muslim minority enclaves with the purpose of advancing Sharia law.

This week, the Trump adminsitration in the United States announced the review of designating certain branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, including its founding branch in Egypt, as foreign terrorist organisations.

The Brotherhood, which specifically targets young Muslims in France, has apparently been successful in promoting hardline interpretations of the Qur’an and radicalising the youth.

A major survey earlier this month from the French Institute of Public Opinion (Ifop) found that 18-25 year old Muslims are not only more radical than their parents, but are also significantly more radical than 18 to 25s of the past.

The survey, which Ifop said exceeded “the most pessimistic estimates” about assimilation, found that six in ten young Muslims would prefer Sharia Law over the laws of France and four in ten are supportive of at least one radical Islamist group, with the Muslim Brotherhood being the most popular.

In line with the Brotherhood’s agenda of imposing strict adherence to Islamic codes, the survey found that the number of young Muslim women who weir [veils] increa[s]ed from 16 per cent in 1989 to 45 per cent today.

The French senate report described the Islamic veil as the “banner of sexual apartheid, an instrument of social control and territorial marking” and an instrument that allows “entire territories to experience ghettoization with the creation of parallel societies that escape republican norms.”

Therefore, the lawmakers called for the “the prohibition of the veiling of girls and young girls before the age of 16” and to ban the wearing of the veil by school officials “to preserve the neutrality of the school environment.”

Trump is correct to designate the Muslim Brotherhood the monster they are. Now, other countries, France in particular, must follow suit if they really want to reverse the horror that's going to continue resulting from failure to take action. This will have to include exiling the offenders, including the indoctrinated.

Labels: anti-semitism, dhimmitude, France, immigration, islam, jihad, misogyny, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, war on terror

Another tragedy just as horrible as the Charlie Kirk murder a few months ago took place in Washington D.C, and the worst part here is that this time, it was a jihadist who committed the crime, and a result of Joe Biden's lenient policies that enabled entry of unvetted inhabitants of Afghanistan into the USA:

The alleged attacker who shot two National Guard members in Washington, DC, on Wednesday reportedly yelled, “Allahu Akbar” at some point during the attack, according to Julio Rosas.

FOX News correspondent Brooke Taylor noted, “Law enforcement sources tell me the shooter who shot 2 National Guard members in D.C. is an illegal migrant from Afghan who came in during Operation Allies Welcome, under Biden administration and overstayed that visa.”

The suspect allegedly began his attack with a revolver, and he then used a firearm he was able to take from a female Guard member.

Absolutely abominable, and the monster should receive the death sentence for his repulsive crime. What's additionally disturbing is that the jihadist actually worked with USA forces in Afghanistan years ago:

Rahmanullah Lakanwal, the 29-year-old Afghan national suspected of shooting two National Guardsmen in Washington, DC, worked with the CIA as a member of a partner force in Kandahar, Afghanistan, the agency’s director John Ratcliffe revealed Wednesday night.

Ratcliffe told Fox News Digital of the link, saying the suspect was a “member of a partner force in Kandahar, which ended shortly following the chaotic evacuation.”

Kandahar in southern Afghanistan is in the Taliban heartland of the country. It saw fierce fighting between the Taliban and NATO forces after U.S.-led forces arrived in 2001 following the al-Qaida terrorist attacks on Sept. 11.

“The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including CIA,” Ratcliffe outlined.

He lamented Lakanwal “and so many others—should have never been allowed to come here,” as he added: “God bless our brave troops.”

The USA government has stopped all immigration/asylum requests from Afghanistan following the terrorist attack, and predictably, there's leftists and Islamists who're protesting the decision:

Afghan migrants are protesting President Donald Trump’s decision to block the entry of all escaping Afghanistan nationals after one shot National Guard members in D.C. while reportedly shouting “Allah Akbar,” or “Allah is Supreme.” [...]

The progressives’ insistence that potential Afghan migrants be reviewed by progressive-managed, courtroom-style reviews disregards the reality of the migrants’ home culture. Nearly all Afghans are Muslims, and Islam’s many commandments direct adherents to hate what the Koran hates and to fight non-Muslims.

It is absolutely disgusting, but not surprising, that no leftists like these will change their ways after such a horrible tragedy. But this is precisely why something must be done to put a stop to Islam's advances in the west, and even in the east. This is one of many modern tragedies that confirms the danger has long been in our midst, and cannot be allowed to spread anymore.

Update: the National Guardswoman who was shot by the jihadist has sadly died of her injuries. Condolences to her family.

Labels: Afghanistan, anti-americanism, dhimmitude, immigration, islam, jihad, military, misogyny, Moonbattery, political corruption, racism, sexual violence, terrorism, United States, war on terror, White House