SCOTUS thankfully allows Idaho laws banning transsexual surgeries on children to take effect
Here's a most fortunate ruling from the USA supreme court, on the issue of protecting children from what can be described as a form of genital mutilation:
As for mastectomies like the ones spoken about, let us be perfectly clear: they're a form of stealth jihadism, when you look at this issue in the context of how Hamas terrorists graphically murdered women on October 7, 2023 by cutting off their breasts. That's what makes all this LGBT nightmare so obscene, because mastectomies are basically the same thing - a form of murder of a woman's body.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday to allow an Idaho law protecting children from life-altering transgender procedures to go into effect while the law is challenged in lower courts.This is another example of how the ACLU is more an evil entity than one dedicated to sanity. Thank goodness for now SCOTUS didn't let them have their way. On the other hand, it's horrible that California, by contrast, is allowing these kind of nightmares to occur:
The law, passed last year, bans procedures like double mastectomies on girls who identify as boys and giving children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, which have been linked to bone development issues and heart problems. The law also stipulates that doctors who perform transgender procedures on kids could go to prison for 10 years. The decision means the law will go into effect for the state except for two families who say their children identify as transgender who sued with the help of the ACLU claiming the law was discriminatory.
Justices Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all sided with Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador who appealed to the court to turn back a sweeping injunction placed on the law by a federal judge who completely blocked the law. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all dissented.
A Texas father is left powerless as he fights his ex-wife in a California court over her insistence to start their son on puberty blockers.It goes entirely without saying the "mother" doing this to her son is a monster, and that she took him to California, now providing sanctuary for horrors like these, speaks volumes.
The terrifying saga facing Jeff Younger is a cautionary tale about how the U.S. court system is weaponized against parents who do not go along with the transgender cult. For years, Younger and his ex-wife, Anne Georgulas, have fought over custody of their children, with the highlight of their fight being about one of their sons, who she believes is transgender.
Georgulas moved their children, including their 11-year-old son, to California against the wishes of their father. The move was protected after Younger lost his petition in the Texas Supreme Court to force her to return the children to Texas.
As for mastectomies like the ones spoken about, let us be perfectly clear: they're a form of stealth jihadism, when you look at this issue in the context of how Hamas terrorists graphically murdered women on October 7, 2023 by cutting off their breasts. That's what makes all this LGBT nightmare so obscene, because mastectomies are basically the same thing - a form of murder of a woman's body.
Labels: anti-americanism, california, lgbt cultism, misogyny, Moonbattery, sexual violence, Texas, United States
