Tel-Chai Nation

The New York Post wrote about the Harry Potter author's brave opposition to the transgender ideology that happens to be endangering women in more ways than one, mainly because those backing it have no concern over women's safety:

COVID-19 may have canceled the Pride Month parades, but LGBT activists have found another way to celebrate: vilifying J.K. Rowling.

The zillionaire “Harry Potter” author recently earned the wrath of the trans movement when she averred that biological sex is real. After reading an article that referred to “people who menstruate,” instead of “women,” Rowling took to Twitter: “ ‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” She added: “If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. . . . I do not believe it’s hateful to say so.”

Her take launched a thousand denunciations from trans activists, who declared Rowling a transphobic, bigoted TERF (“trans-exclusionary radical feminist”). It’s tough to “cancel” a household name, but her detractors are trying their best. Several employees at Hachette, Rowling’s publishing house, have said they may refuse to work on her forthcoming book, “The Ickabog.”

Even the young actors who owe their ­careers and platforms to Rowling publicly condemned her. “Transgender women are women,” announced “Potter” star Daniel Radcliffe. Never mind that Rowling is, as he admits, “unquestionably responsible” for the course his life has taken and, therefore, might deserve a tad more consideration.

But Rowling was merely noting that the trans agenda — and the distortions of language it demands — is a form of misogyny, yet another means of demeaning women. Men who transition don’t share the common experience of biological females. It is an offense against women to claim that they do.

Exactly. Nor do men get pregnant, so there's another female experience they don't share. And Radcliffe's not helping by throwing a lady to whom he owes much of his own career and reputation under the bus. The employees at Hachette who attacked her for defending women's dignity would do better to resign their positions and not work there again.

At the same time as this is going on, it's disgraceful that the supreme court has made a ruling that could favor transsexual ideology, and harm businesses who don't want the mentality being forced upon their management. It could lead to corruption, with transsexuals doing everything to force employers to keep them on the payroll and never be able to dismiss them, if at all. The worst part is how they even believe it's inherently acceptable for men pretending to be women to enter a woman's bathroom with virtually no regard for privacy of the opposite sex. This is something else Rowling's taken issue with, for fully valid reasons, given how it's led to the dangers of sexual assault.

There's been a poll conducted where 66 percent believe the government shouldn't be involved in religious organizations' hiring choices. But this should apply to other businesses as well, based on ideological beliefs. Forcing one's culture that extremely upon anybody is exactly why the LGBT movement is losing respect of the masses, because that's all they care about, and they never give a damn about the gays and lesbians persecuted in Muslim countries. Their only purpose for being is to cripple and devastate western values/society.

So Rowling's stance is encouraging, and just what we need right now. It instills a new special respect in me for her.

Labels: lgbt cultism, londonistan, misogyny, Moonbattery, showbiz, United States