Tel-Chai Nation

Bethany Hamilton, the champion surfer who lost her left arm in a shark attack while swimming in the early 2000s (and had a movie biography about her a dozen years ago, IIRC), has made clear this Orwellian imposition of transsexuality on women's sports is unacceptable:

"Speak your truth! Less than 1% of people think this policy reflects fairness."

The world’s most inspirational surfer Bethany Hamilton opened a Pandora’s Box yesterday when she recorded a piece to camera damning the WSL’s new policy on trans-women competing in the gal’s div at the highest level.

It sounds like the surfing magazine's got issues with what she's saying, meaning, they're turning against her, regrettably enough. But she shouldn't seek to please ideologues that awful. The Federalist followed up with this point:

For asking questions and standing up for herself and other female surfers who “are not in support of this new rule” because “they fear being ostracized if they speak up,” Hamilton was smeared as “transphobic.” For not accepting the WSL’s narrative that the rule promoted “equity and fairness,” she was deemed “controversial.”

Yet Hamilton is right. There’s nothing fair about pitting women against men in a physical competition, something most Americans oppose. There’s also nothing controversial about speaking that truth.

It’s well-known and proven that being male or female isn’t just the result of hormone shifts during puberty. It’s something that begins in the womb and is found in DNA regardless of attempts to tamper with it.

Allowing men who take castration drugs to compete against women isn’t “fairness.” It’s a rejection of the fact that sex is intrinsic and a slap in the face of female athletes who have devoted their time and effort to their sport.

“Have any of the current surfers in the World Surf League been asked what their thoughts and opinions are on this new rule before it was passed or announced? Should there be a conversation with the 17 women and all of the men on Twitter prior to a rule change such as this? Is a hormone level an honest and accurate depiction that someone indeed is a male or female?” Hamilton asked in her video. Later, she wondered whether a rule like this “betters the sport of surfing.”

The answer is no. Miley-Dyer already admitted this rule was implemented at the behest of “a lot of different stakeholder groups,” not the surfers who were already loyal to and competing in WSL competitions. She also acknowledged that data about males in female sports, which already exists, may force the league to change its policy.

Those stakeholders have no business being in the industries they're working in, and should resign from their jobs for the damage they've caused. Above all, they should be ashamed of themselves and apologize to all the lady athletes they've hurt.

Since we're on the subject of women's sports being destroyed by this shame and disgrace, a brand new reboot of the 1989-93 TV series Quantum Leap has regrettably added insult to injury:

Monday's episode, "Let Them Play," was a full hour of trans propaganda. The show ignored, dismissed or derided the pain felt by young female athletes who have had their sports and privacy invaded by biological males.

[...] "Let Them Play" begins with the new scientist, Dr. Ben Song (Raymond Lee), leaping into the place of a 2012 high school basketball coach. He leaps into the middle of a game just as one of the players has suffered an injury. Song sends an alternate, Gia (Josielyn Aguilera), to play instead.

Controversy is soon ignited because it turns out the alternate is actually a biological male, a trans "woman." Gia is also the coach's child.

The rest of the show descends into a lecture about how Gia should be able to play and how amazing trans kids are. Opposition to Gia playing will only drive him closer to running away from home, it's alleged.

The fact that Gia cannot be in the same locker room as the biological girls on the team is portrayed as cruel. A mop falls on top of Gia in the janitor's closet where he changes.

A teammate's mother fights to keep Gia from playing.

"We had to fight for Title IX," the mother tells Gia's parents. "So I'm not gonna sit here as you take away women's sports because you think there's no difference between boys and girls."

But this concerned mother is portrayed as a cold, uptight Karen-like figure. Gia's own mother dismisses her concerns with the magic word, "inclusion."

In the end, Song succeeds in having Gia play as a full participant on the team and the female teammates all encourage Gia to change with them in their locker room.

It goes without saying this is horrific, and taints the legacy of the original TV show starring Scott Bakula and the late Dean Stockwell. But sadly enough, even that wasn't clean of a bias that favored homosexuals, and turned lesbians by contrast into cheap fodder for stereotypical depictions as murderesses, recalling 2 contrasting episodes there, where a lesbian in the 1950s turned out to be the culprit in the murder of another woman who rejected her attraction, while a homosexual, by contrast, was depicted sympathetically. Some could say those contrasting examples were but a prelude to what's going on in Hollywood now. Another problem with the new series' episode:

That scene is a Hollywood psyops, with a bit of race-baiting tossed in for good measure.

The reality is that girls don't feel comfortable changing in front of trans students, but they face bans and retaliation from school administrations for speaking out. Girls have had to deal with the trauma of being exposed to male genitalia against their will in locker rooms due to trans policies. Those stories of violation never make contemporary Hollywood scripts.

During the episode, we learn that Gia announced he was trans in the fifth grade. It's unclear what degree of puberty blockers and hormones the character has been given or if he is yet castrated. How any child can be certain they are trans at ten years old and encouraged onto a life-altering path so young is also never addressed.

It's in complete violation of the Torah/Bible's belief that you shouldn't abuse and desecrate your body, but lest we forget, Hollywood's long become a very hostile place for Judaists. On which note, there's another article here by Corrine Blackmer, about antisemitism, anti-Israelism and anti-Zionism condoned by LGBTQ activists:

Some years ago, I was the target of a series of antisemitic, homophobic, and anti-Zionist hate crimes on the campus of Southern Connecticut State University, where I teach. Aside from the death threats and property defacement, what troubled me most was how authorities and colleagues only acknowledged the homophobic part of the crime. Despite my protestations, the anti-Zionism was erased and the antisemitism, which was not subtle—a swastika drawn on my car with mud—was severely minimalized. On college campuses these days, LGBTQ concerns (as well as racial ones) always count. Anti-Zionism never does, and antisemitism only when it occurs alone—not in relation to other forms of social animus.

This series of hate crimes against me took place—in a way I have never found coincidental—during one of the periodic eruptions of hostilities between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Several days later, I again found my office door defaced, and death threats left on my office telephone. One faculty member I knew who had read about the hate crime on the front page of The New Haven Register rushed to empathize, calling me the victim of “the homo-hating patriarchy.” I winced at my colleague commiserating with me in an ideological language that I knew targeted me in other ways.

As a lesbian Zionist academic, I have felt my once-solid alliances shatter, and my beloved communities of belonging descend into warring camps. Over the past few decades, as the academic field of queer studies has become more visible and influential, some of its leading proponents have pushed the idea that opposing Israel’s existence is a natural position for gays and lesbians to adopt. But, of course, it is not at all obvious why the progressive academics I once considered allies, who see themselves as champions of LGBTQ rights, have come to regard Israel—which has a sterling record of civil rights for gay people, ranging from housing and workplace protections to adoption and inheritance rights—as the “hetero-patriarchal,” homophobic, and “homo-nationalistic” enemy of queers.

I'd been aware antisemitism among LGBT practitioners was around for a long time, and this is just another confirmation what's wrong with the cult's conduct. And why lesbians shouldn't associate with them, period, because truly, they've never been supportive of lesbians, and won't support those practicing sports when transsexual men come about.

And doesn't that indicate the problem with these homosexual movements is that they're actually run by a form of patriarchy? More precisely, by men, gay or otherwise, but there you have it. So what's the point of lesbians sticking with these thugs anyway? Yes, seriously. Besides, they've thrown Jewish homosexuals under the bus too.

Update: here's some more info on just how embarrassingly repellent the neo-Quantum Leap episode happens to be. As impressive as the original series was, this new one has the effect of compounding a decision not to watch it anymore either.

Labels: anti-americanism, anti-semitism, islam, Israel, Judaism, lgbt cultism, misogyny, Moonbattery, showbiz, United States