Tel-Chai Nation

One of the most devastating examples of the USA's plummeting values is that marriage - and birthrates - have been in serious decline for many years:

Marriage is on the rocks in America, and redefining it only seems to be hastening its decline. The redefinition of marriage has not stopped with same-sex relationships. After winning that fight, The New York Times has been enthusiastically pushing polyamory. This means polygamy is back, baby! All it needed was a quick makeover. America’s elite are happy to embrace polygamy—so long as it is relabeled as polyamory and waves the rainbow flag.

This effort is having an effect. Just look at Cambridge, Massachusetts, where the local government voted to recognize domestic partnerships of three or more people. This is not some obscure hippie hamlet, but the home of Harvard University, and the law was developed with the help of the Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic. As coal-mine canaries go, this is a big bird.

All this indicates yet again that the social conservative Cassandras were right in their predictions. During the same-sex marriage debates, LGBT activists professed outrage at the suggestion that polygamy might be next. Now, less than a decade later, they are vigorously pushing us down the slippery slope they insisted didn’t exist. Rod Dreher’s law of merited impossibility has an obvious corollary: “That will never happen, and it will be awesome when it does.”

The sexual revolution’s redefinition of family was never going to stop with same-sex marriage, but few on the left have had the courage to say no to the expansion of the alphabet agenda. People who insisted same-sex marriage would have no effect on the rest of us now want to punish dissenters who don’t want to promote and celebrate same-sex weddings. People who declared this was about consenting adults are now all-in on the LGBT youth agenda, from child drag queens to transgender toddlers.

Let me just note one thing: in an era where birthrates have plummeted horribly, polygamy in itself isn't the worst thing that could happen if it served as a means to produce more children. But if the whole ideas is that it'd serve more to bolster LGBT ideology, then that's where it becomes just another sad example of how far sanity has fallen. So instead of being promoted as a means to reproduce more kiddies for the future, it sounds like it's more an excuse for LGBT couples to become "throuples" or more, and worse, to possibly become guardians of toddlers whom they can indoctrinate.

And worst is how these ideologues are basically the kind of people one could describe as Opposite Sex Rejectors (OSRs), who indoctrinate their subjects into shunning relations with the opposite sex (not to mention the possibilities of becoming fathers and mothers), and even brainwash them into pretending they are the opposite sex themselves, by taking up transsexuality as a lifestyle. Of all the punk subcultures you could find on this planet, transsexual ideology is one of the most degrading, teaching the subjects to despise their own gender and damage themselves in the process through pseudo-medical means. It's leading to some very unhappy people along the way, and will cause serious damage in the long run, as it already has to marriage.

And lest I forget, I'm not letting religion off the hook as one of the elephants in the room that could've influenced homosexality over many centuries, depending on the customs and practices involved. Anyone who thinks it's impossible for religion to turn people homosexual is truly putting their heads in the sand.

Labels: lgbt cultism, misogyny, Moonbattery, sexual violence, United States