If World War Three breaks out, will anybody be willing to fight in it?
Here's some commentary on the terrible situation many innocent people in France had foisted upon themselves by apologists for Islam over past decades. For example, Giulio Meotti, and also Bruce Bawer. Both paint a very sad, bleak picture of what they see as the future for France, which could be the collapse into a horror story of Islamofascism and worse.
And it begs the question: is anybody who's a realist and trained in military combat willing to go to war if it breaks out, as was the case during World War 2? Because if not, then not only are they enabling jihdists to take the lives of many innocent people, they're also showing a considerable amount of ingratitude for saving many Jews during the Holocaust, not to mention France's contribution of the Statue of Liberty to the USA in the late 19th century.
So any and all with common sense and army training are going to have to make some hard decisions, and sooner rather than later, whether they're willing to defend innocent lives and put a stop to the jihadists now entrenched in much of Europe. Because if not, it's entirely possible that some day, there'll be jihadists building nuclear weapons on European soil, just like over in Iran. And that'll prove very fatal for Israel to boot.
Update: while we're on the subject, a majority of the French public blame mass migration policies on the terrible experiences that've occurred again:
And it begs the question: is anybody who's a realist and trained in military combat willing to go to war if it breaks out, as was the case during World War 2? Because if not, then not only are they enabling jihdists to take the lives of many innocent people, they're also showing a considerable amount of ingratitude for saving many Jews during the Holocaust, not to mention France's contribution of the Statue of Liberty to the USA in the late 19th century.
So any and all with common sense and army training are going to have to make some hard decisions, and sooner rather than later, whether they're willing to defend innocent lives and put a stop to the jihadists now entrenched in much of Europe. Because if not, it's entirely possible that some day, there'll be jihadists building nuclear weapons on European soil, just like over in Iran. And that'll prove very fatal for Israel to boot.
Update: while we're on the subject, a majority of the French public blame mass migration policies on the terrible experiences that've occurred again:
The riots that recently swept across France were a result of “failures of migration policy” according to six in ten in the country, despite attempts by the political establishment to gloss over the role of mass migration in the social breakdown in France.When it comes to the apologists, even Jacques Chirac tried to downplay the 2005 riots. This data shows the public isn't fooled.
A survey conducted this week by Odoxa-Backbone Consulting for the Le Figaro newspaper found that the overwhelming majority of the French public (84 per cent) denounced the violence that broke out following the police killing of an Algerian-heritage teenager last month. Although the violence and rioting have subsided to some degree, nearly nine in ten (89 per cent) fear for the future of their country following the breakdown in social order.
While establishment figures, such as former President François Hollande and Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin have attempted to cast blame elsewhere, a firm majority of the French, 59 per cent, openly stated that they believe the riots were “the consequence of the failures of our migration policy”. An even larger majority, 71 per cent, said that there should be a reduction in immigration to the country.
Labels: anti-semitism, dhimmitude, Europe, France, islam, Israel, jihad, United States
